du.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Movement control tests for the lumbopelvic complex. Are these tests reliable and valid?
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, ISSN 0959-3985, E-ISSN 1532-5040, Vol. 33, nr 5, s. 386-397Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This study evaluated inter- and intra-observer reliability and discriminative validity of three movement control tests: 1) standing knee-lift test; 2) static lunge test; and 3) dynamic lunge test. Thirty-eight subjects, 21 with low-back pain and 17 healthy, were video-recorded while performing the tests. Four physical therapists scored the tests according to a standardized protocol and calculated a composite score for each test based on the number of incorrect test components. Inter-observer reliability for the composite scores ranged between 0.68 and 0.80 (ICC 2,k) and intra-observer reliability between 0.54 and0.82 (ICC 2,1). The separate test components ranged between 0.32 and 0.91 (κfree) for inter-observer reliability and 0.42 and1.00 for intra-observer reliability. Test components showing the highest values were: back extension; arm lowering; and shoulders moving backwards. Components hip hitch, trunk lateral flexion, knee not lifted straight up and hips moving backwards did not reach accepted thresholds. Discriminative validity ranged between 0.47 and 0.56 (AUC). As our results showed an overall good agreement for the composite, scores and for the majority of the included test components the tests can be considered reliable enough. As the tests' discriminative ability was close to "none", they should, however, not be used for diagnostic purposes but should be further evaluated toward predicted validity.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 33, nr 5, s. 386-397
Emneord [en]
Low-back pain, movement control, reproducibility of results, test, validity
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-25063DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1318422PubMedID: 28537819OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-25063DiVA, id: diva2:1099045
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-05-29 Laget: 2017-05-29 Sist oppdatert: 2020-02-25bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Äng, Björn

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Äng, Björn
I samme tidsskrift
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 93 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf