Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attractors for communication?
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Industri och samhälle, Arbetsvetenskap.
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Industri och samhälle, Arbetsvetenskap.
School for Innovation, Design and Technology, Mälardalen University, Sweden.
2010 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation only (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

From a complexity perspective, interaction in workgroups is interesting because people create relations when interacting, and these relations create social systems which are emergent, complex and sensitive to initial conditions. This paper focuses communication in workgroups and the application of a previously developed model for observing and analyzing the performance of business teams made by Losada & Heaphy (2004). The aim with this paper is to bring further understanding of how and if this model can be used to understand verbal communication in teams.

 

The model (ibid) stresses that three bipolar dimensions, advocacy /inquiry, self /other, and most important, positive /negative statements in communication, can be seen as attractors for communication, showing effectiveness in teams.

 

Communication in 28 workgroup meetings in 13 different organisations have been filmed, observed and analysed. The method and analysis was inspired by the model (ibid). The results show that there were small differences between the teams regarding the dimensions of advocacy /inquiry and self /other, but larger differences concerning positive /negative statements.

 

The results raise some problems and questions. The characterisation of statements is problematic using the definitions given (ibid). The kind of meeting observed and the behaviour of the leader seem to affect the results. The predicted proportion between the different dimensions in the model (ibid), isn’t reflected in the results. How could these results be understood? Are the identified attractors really the ones predicting effectiveness? Is communication perhaps more complex than predicted by the model?

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Palermo, 2010.
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Komplexa system - mikrodataanalys, Attraktiv Konkurrenskraft
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-17099OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-17099DiVA, id: diva2:793650
Konferanse
The 4th International Nonlinear Science Conference (Palermo, Italy). 15-17 mars 2010
Prosjekter
Regisserad Kompetensutveckling
Forskningsfinansiär
VINNOVATilgjengelig fra: 2015-03-09 Laget: 2015-03-09 Sist oppdatert: 2021-11-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Moström Åberg, Marie
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 523 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf