du.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sein oder Nichtsein, das ist hier die Frage: Die Rolle der Grammatik im schwedischen DaF-Unterricht
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Humaniora och medier, Tyska.
2017 (Tyska)Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen), 10 poäng / 15 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)Alternativ titel
The role of grammar in the Swedish GFL-tuition. (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

In this paper I have been aiming to thoroughly investigate the implementing of grammar in the Swedish German-as-foreign-language tuition. The main tool for my survey was to use a questionnaire-form directed towards GFL-teachers. The teachers are all teaching in the 6th to 9th grade of primary school (högstadiet) or 1st to 3rd grade in the Swedish gymnasium (an equivalent to the US senior high school). The central Bureau of education in Sweden (Skolverket) has as of now no clear ruleset for neither the method nor the extent of grammar in the GFL-courses and its focus lies primarily on the fluency and clarity of the produced language (both written as well as spoken). What might cause a stir, is the interpretation of the term “clarity” (in Swedish: “tydlighet”) and it can also leave a great space for free reading and implementing that overtime could have evolved into a varied quality of tuition that above all depends on the interpretation or the preferences of the tutor. I have not engaged in the task of explaining this term, but rather strived to find out how other teachers do. It all runs down to the question: How do the GFL-teachers in Sweden de facto teach? My surveys result in regard to the first question: “how do GFL-teachers teach?” ended with a little less than half (43,33%) of the teachers using “traditional” methods whereas the majority (56,66) were to perceive as “modern”. The second question “how do GFL-teachers find the Commentary materials?” 33,3% saw the GFL-tuition materials from Skolverket as sufficient, 30% as insufficient and the rest had no opinion. The most mentioned shortcoming of the commentary was undoubtedly the lack of examples.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2017.
Nyckelord [de]
Grammar, German, GFL, Sweden, language, german-as-foreign-language Grammatik, Deutsch, DaF, Schweden, Sprache, Deutsch als Fremdsprache, Kartierung, kartläggning, moderna språk, tyska, skolverket, gymnasiet, högstadiet.
Nationell ämneskategori
Studier av enskilda språk
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-25511OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-25511DiVA, id: diva2:1120735
Tillgänglig från: 2017-07-07 Skapad: 2017-07-07 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-13

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Av organisationen
Tyska
Studier av enskilda språk

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 54 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf