du.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors that influence collaboration between psychiatric care and CSSs: Experiences of working together in the interest of persons with long-term mental illness living in the community
Ersta Sköndal University College.
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Utbildning, hälsa och samhälle, Omvårdnad.
2009 (Engelska)Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 23, nr 1, s. 140-145Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Since de-institutionalization of psychiatric care (PC) took place in Sweden during the second half of the 20th century, the intended collaboration between the two organizations, PC and community social service (CSS) has been evaluated as inadequate in providing care for persons with long-term mental illness living in the community.

Aim: The aim of this explorative study was to examine factors that influence interdisciplinary teamwork between PC and CSSs based on the experience of nursing staff within two separate organizations.

Method: Five focus groups were selected as an appropriate method to collect data. Two of these groups were recruited from the PC and three from the CSSs. The focus groups consisted of psychiatric nurses and mental healthcare workers. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify major themes in the data.

Findings: Two main themes were found, external organizational factors and interpersonal factors that deter or enhance collaboration between PC and CSS. Separate care plans, unclear times for meetings were found to be a plausible reason for communication failure. The focus groups representing each of the two organizations viewed themselves as 'us and them'. Different ideologies and goals for caring and service and how to use each other's competence seemed to be explanations as well as consequences of not finding ways to work together.

Conclusion: The results of this study points to the need for the two organizations to find ways to work more effectively together to realize a joint responsibility for the patient/client. 

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2009. Vol. 23, nr 1, s. 140-145
Nyckelord [en]
Collaboration, Community social service, Focus groups, Interpersonal factors, Long-term mental illness, Organizational factors, Psychiatric care, Qualitative content analysis, article, cooperation, human, information processing, interdisciplinary communication, long term care, mental disease, mental health service, psychiatric nursing, social adaptation, Sweden, Community Mental Health Services, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Long-Term Care, Mental Disorders, Social Adjustment
Nationell ämneskategori
Hälsovetenskaper
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-19615DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00600.xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-60449116093OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-19615DiVA, id: diva2:860836
Tillgänglig från: 2015-10-14 Skapad: 2015-10-06 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-01Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lützen, Kim
Av organisationen
Omvårdnad
I samma tidskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Hälsovetenskaper

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 309 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf