du.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Så blev vi alla rasister: Om forskning som bländar och förblindar
Malmö högskola.
2006 (Swedish)In: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 43, no 3, 5-21 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

“Structural oppression” has become a key concept in contemporary Swedish debate on migration and ethnic issues. The aim of this article is to critically examine this explanatory concept that has caused confusion among researchers and politicians. There is a tendency among the advocates of the concept to not accept alternative interpretations. By scrutinizing the theoretical foundations of the perspective this propensity is criticized. When every difference between immigrants and ethnic Swedes is characterized as oppression you confuse a descriptive structuralism with a normative structuralism. One argument in the article is that by doing this you will miss the opportunity to identify social problems other than an oppressive Swedish population. The inability of the perspective to include active subjects is discussed in this context. One consequence is that normative structuralism can not explain the complexity of multicultural relations. In short, the concept of structural oppression can not explain the process that has lead to the present social situation. Normative structuralism therefore comes with a reductionism, which is criticized. As an alternative it is argued for a pluralistic research policy. Another peculiarity with the use of “structural oppression” in contemporary debate is that there is a conceptual drift from “oppression” towards “racism”. This drift is damaging because the interpretation of “racism” in the structuralistic framework makes the majority of the population racist. But, who can be accused for racism if everybody is a racist?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Sociologförbund , 2006. Vol. 43, no 3, 5-21 p.
Keyword [en]
structuralism, oppression, racism, democracy
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-24349OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-24349DiVA: diva2:1074731
Note

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Available from: 2017-02-16 Created: 2017-02-16 Last updated: 2017-02-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1215 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1215 kBChecksum SHA-512
0a106a83a9fc1d12ae2c684bccab7e379c9c85d08e997e561f2d4b01c8e5e8875d42985d272ee86feae3f5870a6cd37c237b97f69af1b6bc13e59aa2d689e20d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
In the same journal
Sociologisk forskning
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf