Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nurses' sources of information to inform clinical practice: An integrative review to guide evidence-based practice
Centre for Caring Research, Southern Norway, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Dalarna University, School of Health and Welfare, Caring Science/Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3964-196X
2022 (English)In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, ISSN 1545-102X, E-ISSN 1741-6787, Vol. 19, no 5, p. 372-379Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice in nursing is challenging and relies on the sources of information used by nurses to inform clinical practice. An integrative review from 2008 revealed that nurses more frequently relied on information from colleagues than information from high-level sources such as systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

AIMS: To describe the information sources used by registered nurses to inform their clinical practice.

METHODS: An integrative review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, based on empirical research studies published from January 2007 until June 2021. The included studies were appraised, following which the identified sources of information from quantitative studies were compiled and ranked. Finally, the qualitative text data were summarized into categories.

RESULTS: Fifty-two studies from various countries were included. The majority of studies employed a quantitative design and used original instruments. Peers were ranked as the number one source of information to inform nurses' clinical practice. However, computers and reference materials are now ranked among the top four most used information sources.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Improvement in computer and information searching skills, as well as the availability of computerized decision support tools, may contribute to nurses' frequent use of digital sources and reference material to inform clinical practice. This review shows that nurses' most frequently reported peer nurses as their source of information in clinical practice. Information sources such as computers and reference materials were ranked higher, and information from patients was ranked lower than in the 2008 review. Developing and standardizing instruments and ensuring high-quality study design is critical for further research on nurses' sources of information for clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 19, no 5, p. 372-379
Keywords [en]
evidence-based practice, integrative review, registered nurses, sources of information
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-39792DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12569ISI: 000764107000001PubMedID: 35244324Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85125563081OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-39792DiVA, id: diva2:1642887
Available from: 2022-03-08 Created: 2022-03-08 Last updated: 2023-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(523 kB)1039 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 523 kBChecksum SHA-512
2de2b5d8091285b3984037a7af86dbc0e1433d80522de9ec377760e92bdbca24107f12a6aaf7e44cf389cb72b6156c71ccd26764cfe6fbce139af204c1de6898
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ehrenberg, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ehrenberg, Anna
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1041 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 435 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf