du.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of the Content and Quality in Briefs Instrument (CQB-I)
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Utbildning, hälsa och samhälle, Omvårdnad.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7044-8896
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Utbildning, hälsa och samhälle, Omvårdnad. Sahlgrenska akademin.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-8267-592X
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, ISSN 1937-5867, E-ISSN 2167-5112, Vol. 5, nr 3, s. 74-88Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: The Content and quality of Briefs Instrument (CQB-I) was designed to develop a valid and reliable audit instrument to examine the content and quality of information in documents (briefs) created in the early stages of designing healthcare environments.

Background: The importance of effective briefing has been emphasised in many research studies during the past two decades. However, there is no developed instrument for auditing the content and quality of the documents, which makes this paper interesting.

Methods: The study had a methodological and developmental design based on an established methodology for instrument development and validation. The development process consisted of three main phases: item generation and scale construction, assessment of face and content validity, and finally, testing of the reliability. To obtain face and content validity, expert panels reviewed the CQB-I. Content validity was assessed by using the Content Validity Index (I-CVI=item level, S-CVI=scale level). The reliability was tested by test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Results: CQB-I was found to have good content validity (I-CVI =0.78 – 1.0 and S-CVI=0.98). Inter-rater reliability was acceptable (Spearman’s correlation = 0.62) and the stability was considered high for both raters (83% respectively 88%).

Conclusions: The instrument can be used as a guide for the work process in the design team and contribute to the ongoing development of making the design process more user-oriented with the ultimate goal of healthcare environments designed for a patient-centered care.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
New York: Vendome Group LLC , 2012. Vol. 5, nr 3, s. 74-88
Emneord [en]
Designprocess, audit, instrument developing, quality work
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Hälsa och välfärd
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-5712ISI: 000304793800008PubMedID: 23002570OAI: oai:dalea.du.se:5712DiVA, id: diva2:520397
Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-08-21 Laget: 2011-08-21 Sist oppdatert: 2017-07-31bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

PubMed

Personposter BETA

Elf, Marie

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Elf, MarieSvedbo Engström, Maria
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Health Environments Research & Design Journal

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 707 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf