du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Livsvärldens rationalisering och studiet av partikularism
Lunds universitet.
1997 (Swedish)In: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 34, no 3, p. 59-78Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Particularism and the reationalization of the lifeworld

A phenomenon that has attracted increasing attention during the last decades is particularism (e.g. ethnic identification, nationalism). I belive that Habermas’ theory of the rationalization of the lifeworld can be made fruitful for the study of this phenomenon. The concept of the ”rationalization of the lifeworld”, however,needs to be differentiated in order to grasp the ambivalent character of modern particularism, which is both rational and irrational. It is rational in the sense that it is often supported by conscious reasons; it is irrational in the sense that these reasons do not claim validity outside of the particular group. I therefore propose that the concept of ”the rationalization of the lifeworld” be divided in two: critical rationalization and generalization. Critical rationalization means an increase in people's ability to critizice beliefs and that justifications therefore have to be made more explicit. Generalization means that justifications are made more generally acceptable. These two kinds of rationalization are not always parallell. They are separate processes, and modern particularism is, I believe, the result of a divergence of critical rationalization and generalization. This differentiation of the conceptof rationalization is therefore a necessary first step in order to turn Habermas’ theory into a theory of particularism. It also has the advantage of more clearly bringing into light some features of his view of reification.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Sociologförbund , 1997. Vol. 34, no 3, p. 59-78
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-25912OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-25912DiVA, id: diva2:1137040
Note

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Available from: 2017-08-30 Created: 2017-08-30 Last updated: 2017-08-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1427 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1427 kBChecksum SHA-512
1a81acb758a32195521e86f975853905415b102f5ccfc88e91590cb4b0364c035b26edc2f14711f7b6f83433e49de2709717463b2d999a086bf21e64168095c7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
In the same journal
Sociologisk forskning
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf