du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Den ubehagelige kroppsligheten
Universitetet i Bergen.
1996 (Norwegian)In: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 33, no 2-3, p. 71-86Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article raises some questions related to the ways we feel, react and think about the body and especially the bodily taboos. The body is a source for lust, desire and sexual pleasures as well as a source for experiences of shame, taboos and feelings of disgust and filthiness. But while it is relatively easy and uncomplicated to experience the bodily pleasures, it seems to be far more complicated and endangering to deal with body taboos. My studies of care work have made me aware of the paradox that whereas care and nursing are invariable initiated by bodily needs, the body as such is rendered absent in our understanding and analysis of care as work and culture alike. This goes especially for the kind of care work that is related to bodily decay, dirt and waste. The existence of bodily taboos seem to structure caring relations in certain ways. Experiences from the field of intimate care are seldom verbalised and talked about since as well carers as recipients have complicated feelings linked to their tabooed parts of the body. Such experiences are, however, a result of bodily functions we all share as human beings. During the processes of western individualization, the body-related all-human experiences have increasingly been connected to feelings of shame and guilt. It is, however, not possible to draw sharp lines between the body and personal identity: the body that produces dirt and waste and the whole person. Feelings of distaste that can occur in caring relations are tabooed and professional techniques of distancing oneself are developed. This implies the pretendance of not ”hearing, seeing or smelling” the bodilyness of other people. Such reactions are common, and based on cultural denial of the organic processes of life itself.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Sociologförbund , 1996. Vol. 33, no 2-3, p. 71-86
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-25981OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-25981DiVA, id: diva2:1139966
Note

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Available from: 2017-09-11 Created: 2017-09-11 Last updated: 2017-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1147 kB)16 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1147 kBChecksum SHA-512
31f13ef85993e1b347df37d709ad860ad7bc0cc399eec655ac9764f0f9b635ae7f9dbc8550c6ba376d61ebea80ae0d4c79cf211a7c34f32d78f3acfa521c9bd2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
In the same journal
Sociologisk forskning
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 16 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf