du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Begreppet solidaritet i generationsstudier - en kritisk diskussion
Uppsala universitet.
1994 (Swedish)In: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 23-43Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Solidarity in intergenerational studies - a concept under debate

In intergenerational studies the concept of ’solidarity’ has been crucial in analyses of the relations between the generations. The concept of ’solidarity’ is based on Durkheim’s concept of ’mechanic solidarity’, and is developed out of theories about cohesion in small groups presuming connections between contact, affection and value similarity. The concept of ’intergenerational solidarity’ is assumed to be a single higher-order construct of various dimensions correlated with each other. Some earlier empirical studies fail to support these presumptions, which in spite of this has not led to a critical discussion, or reconsideration of the theoretical presumptions of this concept. The purpose of this presentation is to put the concept of ’intergenerational solidarity’ under debate in the light of these earlier results and of empirical results from a Swedish survey conducted in three family generations. The survey includes two parent generations; one older and one middle-aged, and two child generations; the middle-aged ones and one younger generation, totally 888 subjects between 15 and 97 years of age. The analyses show that presumed connections between the various solidarity dimensions are lacking. The lack of correlations refer especially to the parent generations, and to a lesser degree to the child generations, which might be explained by the asymmetric relationship between parents and children. Theoretically, this lack of correlation might be due to its origin in small group theory and its presumption of voluntary group membership. Family and kinship relations are not voluntary, and as intergenerational relationships are asymmetric, it would be difficult to find a unitary and higher-order concept suitable for both parents and children. The analysis suggests that Durkheim’s concept of ’mechanic solidarity’ does not apply to family and kinship relations. The conclusion is that some of the theoretical presumptions concerning the concept of ’intergenerational solidarity’ are not applicable to family and kinship relations. As an alternative to the concept of ’solidarity’, Weber’s concepts of Vergemeinschaftung and Vergesellschaftung are suggested.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Sociologförbund , 1994. Vol. 31, no 3, p. 23-43
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-26652OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-26652DiVA, id: diva2:1162213
Note

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Available from: 2017-12-04 Created: 2017-12-04 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1377 kB)28 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1377 kBChecksum SHA-512
95d9fa460d2ce8421a3ab32a4353d72a2cf92f9b0f4b958f71864f2918da2bda7cb45b769261cc9851566314a5b5876b9bdf95a29b63d20b3915d40108fef4d7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
In the same journal
Sociologisk forskning
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 28 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf