Paradoxes of person‐centred care: A discussion paperShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Nursing Open, E-ISSN 2054-1058, Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329
Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
AIM: Previous research has mainly focused on the advantages of PCC and less on its disadvantages. Hence, there is a need to further explore the recent research regard-ing PCC from both sides. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to elucidate the advan-tages and disadvantages of PCC.
DESIGN: Discussion paper.
METHODS: We searched relevant literature published January 2000–March 2018 in PubMed, Medline, CHINAL, Scopus and Web of Science.
RESULTS: The results showed that PCC can contribute to improved health and well-being, improved mutual interaction in relationships, improved cost-effectiveness and im-proved work environment, while the disadvantages can involve increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of certain groups, increased personal and financial costs, exclu-sion of staff's personhood and unfairness due to empathy. An analysis of the existing literature on PCC showed paradoxes, which call for further investigation.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2020. Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329
Keywords [en]
clinical practice, concept, evidence, healthcare, person-centred care
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-33873DOI: 10.1002/nop2.520OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-33873DiVA, id: diva2:1440507
2020-06-112020-06-152021-06-14Bibliographically approved