Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intrapartum and postpartum care in Sweden: women's opinions and risk factors for not being satisfied.
Karolinska Institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6388-5155
2006 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 85, no 5, p. 551-60Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care, and the risk of not being satisfied in relation to 1) a woman's sociodemographic background, 2) physical and emotional well-being in early pregnancy, 3) labor outcomes, 4) care organization, and 5) a woman's subjective assessment of aspects of care.

METHODS: All Swedish-speaking women booked for antenatal care during 3 weeks spread over 1 year (1999-2000) were invited to participate in the study, and 2,686 (82% of those who consented to participate and 58% of those who were eligible) completed questionnaires in early pregnancy and 2 months postpartum. Women who were satisfied with overall intrapartum and postpartum care respectively were compared with those who were not regarding possible risk factors, and associations were tested by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Ten percent of women were not satisfied with intrapartum care (ip) and 26% with postpartum care (pp). The following risk factors for not being satisfied were found: 1) age <25 years (ip), only elementary school (ip + pp), single status (pp), inconvenient timing of pregnancy (ip), lack of support from partner (ip); 2) suffering from many physical symptoms (ip + pp); 3) newborn transfer to neonatal clinic (ip + pp); 4) length of stay <1 day and > or =5 days (ip + pp), no "debriefing" after birth (ip), large hospital (pp); 5) lack of support by midwife (ip), little involvement in decision making (ip), dissatisfaction with birth environment (ip), insufficient time for breastfeeding support, encouragement and personal questions (pp).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 85, no 5, p. 551-60
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-36110DOI: 10.1080/00016340500345378PubMedID: 16752233OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-36110DiVA, id: diva2:1527984
Available from: 2021-02-12 Created: 2021-02-12 Last updated: 2021-02-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Women's evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Women's evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of women s evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care. Evaluations of specific aspects of care, general assessments of intrapartum and postpartum care, and predictors of not being satisfied were investigated, as well as negative experiences of postpartum care, as expressed in women s own words. The four papers included in this thesis are based on selected quantitative data (Papers I-III) and qualitative data (Paper IV) from a national prospective longitudinal study (the KUB study: Women s Experiences of Childbirth). During a period of three weeks, evenly spread over one year (in May and September 1999 and January 2000), women were recruited at their first booking visit at an antenatal clinic. In total, 593 (97%) antenatal clinics participated in the recruitment. According to the Swedish Medical Birth Register, 4600 women were eligible for study. Approximately 3000 Swedish-speaking women were surveyed at three time points: early pregnancy, two months and one year postpartum. The number of respondents to the first questionnaire was 3061, to the second 2762 and to the third 2563. To assess representativity, the background characteristics of the study sample were compared with the total Swedish birth cohort of women in 1999. When asked to give an overall assessment of their experiences at two months after the birth, 10% of new mothers were not satisfied with intrapartum care and 26% were not satisfied with postpartum care. A more detailed analysis, including specific questions related to different aspects of care (interpersonal care, information and decision-making, information and support, the physical environment, medical check-ups and breastfeeding support) revealed a larger percentage of dissatisfied mothers. By this method, 33% were not satisfied with intrapartum care when assessments on the different dimensions were taken into account simultaneously, and 47% were dissatisfied with postpartum care. These findings illustrate the complexity of care evaluations, and that single-item questions may underestimate negative experiences. When taking all aspects of intrapartum and postpartum care into account, those related to emotional dimensions of care seemed to influence women s assessments the most. Interactions with the caregiver and the interpersonal manner of the caregiver were particularly important. Further important factors were: having sufficient time for personal support, as well as information and involvement in care decisions. Findings indicate that women should be given the opportunity to talk through their birth experience postpartum and air their own questions and concerns. On the postpartum ward, lack of attention to the mother herself was identified as a problem. Dissatisfaction with time available for support and care, was not necessarily too short, but rather inappropriate or not tailored to individual needs. Similarly, the duration of the hospital stay was not seen as sensitive to individual needs. A lack of balanced breastfeeding information and support, with the absence of a tolerant and respectful attitude to mothers who experience difficulties, was reported. The physical environment, both during and after the birth, was associated with women s negative experiences of care. Smaller units and family-oriented wards, where the baby s father could stay overnight, were associated with a positive experience of postpartum care. Some maternal characteristics and health problems during pregnancy related to how care was experienced. Pregnant women who experienced many physical problems had an increased risk of a more negative assessment of both episodes of care, and the risk increased with the number or severity of symptoms. Women with higher depressive symptoms and lower sense of coherence were primarily dissatisfied with interpersonal care as well as information and decision-making during labour. The opposite was found in women who were very satisfied with postpartum care. The outcome of labour and birth, such as infant health, affected women s ratings of intrapartum care. A woman s feelings during labour also seemed to influence the way she rated intrapartum care retrospectively. Altogether 150 women gave written negative comments about postpartum care in response to an openended questionnaire. Problems described by women were: lack of opportunity to rest and recover, nonindividualised information and breastfeeding support, and inappropriate symptom management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, 2007
Keywords
Intrapartum care, postpartum care, risk factors, patient satisfaction, quality of care, mothers experiences, cluster analysis, content analysis
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:du-36112 (URN)978-91-7357-273-6 (ISBN)
Available from: 2021-02-12 Created: 2021-02-12 Last updated: 2021-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Rudman, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rudman, Ann
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 152 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf