Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating multi-dimensional aspects of postnatal hospital care.
Karolinska Institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6388-5155
2008 (English)In: Midwifery, ISSN 0266-6138, E-ISSN 1532-3099, Vol. 24, no 4, p. 425-41Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: to investigate women's experiences of postnatal hospital care in relation to four different aspects: (1) interpersonal care; (2) time spent on physical check-ups; (3) time spent on information and support; and (4) time spent on assistance with breast feeding. More specifically, we aimed to establish whether typical clusters of women could be identified, and if so, whether these clusters could be related to specific outcomes of care, to the way in which care is organised, and to the individual's psychological health and socio-demographic background.

DESIGN: longitudinal population-based survey, including three questionnaires completed in early pregnancy, at 2 months and 1 year after birth.

SETTING: all postnatal wards in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS: women (n=2338) recruited at their first booking visit at 593 antenatal clinics, who responded to questions relating to postnatal hospital care 2 months after birth.

FINDINGS: eight cluster profiles defined by the four aspects of postnatal care were identified. About half of the women were found in clusters that were satisfied with most aspects of care, and half in clusters that were dissatisfied with one aspect or more. Only 32% were very satisfied with all four dimensions. Specific groups of women, such as first-time mothers, migrants, young mothers and those with a short length of stay, were dissatisfied with different assessments of postnatal care. Psychological health in early pregnancy was associated with high ratings of all aspects of care, whereas emergency caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery was associated with dissatisfaction with breast feeding support and time spent on health check-ups.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: women's individual appraisal of specific aspects of hospital postnatal care could be grouped into response patterns that were shared by smaller or larger groups. These patterns were related to maternal characteristics, labour outcomes and the way in which care was organised. The multi-faceted approach used in this study provided details about who was dissatisfied with what, and showed that women are not necessarily either satisfied or dissatisfied with care in a general sense. In order to provide individualised care, the carer needs to be aware of these differences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 24, no 4, p. 425-41
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-36108DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.03.004PubMedID: 17892904OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-36108DiVA, id: diva2:1527986
Available from: 2021-02-12 Created: 2021-02-12 Last updated: 2021-02-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Women's evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Women's evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of women s evaluations of intrapartum and postpartum care. Evaluations of specific aspects of care, general assessments of intrapartum and postpartum care, and predictors of not being satisfied were investigated, as well as negative experiences of postpartum care, as expressed in women s own words. The four papers included in this thesis are based on selected quantitative data (Papers I-III) and qualitative data (Paper IV) from a national prospective longitudinal study (the KUB study: Women s Experiences of Childbirth). During a period of three weeks, evenly spread over one year (in May and September 1999 and January 2000), women were recruited at their first booking visit at an antenatal clinic. In total, 593 (97%) antenatal clinics participated in the recruitment. According to the Swedish Medical Birth Register, 4600 women were eligible for study. Approximately 3000 Swedish-speaking women were surveyed at three time points: early pregnancy, two months and one year postpartum. The number of respondents to the first questionnaire was 3061, to the second 2762 and to the third 2563. To assess representativity, the background characteristics of the study sample were compared with the total Swedish birth cohort of women in 1999. When asked to give an overall assessment of their experiences at two months after the birth, 10% of new mothers were not satisfied with intrapartum care and 26% were not satisfied with postpartum care. A more detailed analysis, including specific questions related to different aspects of care (interpersonal care, information and decision-making, information and support, the physical environment, medical check-ups and breastfeeding support) revealed a larger percentage of dissatisfied mothers. By this method, 33% were not satisfied with intrapartum care when assessments on the different dimensions were taken into account simultaneously, and 47% were dissatisfied with postpartum care. These findings illustrate the complexity of care evaluations, and that single-item questions may underestimate negative experiences. When taking all aspects of intrapartum and postpartum care into account, those related to emotional dimensions of care seemed to influence women s assessments the most. Interactions with the caregiver and the interpersonal manner of the caregiver were particularly important. Further important factors were: having sufficient time for personal support, as well as information and involvement in care decisions. Findings indicate that women should be given the opportunity to talk through their birth experience postpartum and air their own questions and concerns. On the postpartum ward, lack of attention to the mother herself was identified as a problem. Dissatisfaction with time available for support and care, was not necessarily too short, but rather inappropriate or not tailored to individual needs. Similarly, the duration of the hospital stay was not seen as sensitive to individual needs. A lack of balanced breastfeeding information and support, with the absence of a tolerant and respectful attitude to mothers who experience difficulties, was reported. The physical environment, both during and after the birth, was associated with women s negative experiences of care. Smaller units and family-oriented wards, where the baby s father could stay overnight, were associated with a positive experience of postpartum care. Some maternal characteristics and health problems during pregnancy related to how care was experienced. Pregnant women who experienced many physical problems had an increased risk of a more negative assessment of both episodes of care, and the risk increased with the number or severity of symptoms. Women with higher depressive symptoms and lower sense of coherence were primarily dissatisfied with interpersonal care as well as information and decision-making during labour. The opposite was found in women who were very satisfied with postpartum care. The outcome of labour and birth, such as infant health, affected women s ratings of intrapartum care. A woman s feelings during labour also seemed to influence the way she rated intrapartum care retrospectively. Altogether 150 women gave written negative comments about postpartum care in response to an openended questionnaire. Problems described by women were: lack of opportunity to rest and recover, nonindividualised information and breastfeeding support, and inappropriate symptom management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, 2007
Keywords
Intrapartum care, postpartum care, risk factors, patient satisfaction, quality of care, mothers experiences, cluster analysis, content analysis
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:du-36112 (URN)978-91-7357-273-6 (ISBN)
Available from: 2021-02-12 Created: 2021-02-12 Last updated: 2021-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Rudman, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rudman, Ann
In the same journal
Midwifery
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf