Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of content validity for a Neonatal Near miss Scale in the context of Ethiopia.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Global Health Action, ISSN 1654-9716, E-ISSN 1654-9880, Vol. 14, no 1, article id 1983121Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The concept of neonatal near miss is used to identify neonates who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication in the first 28 days of life. Neonatal mortality is the tip of the iceberg. Quality improvement through utilization of a validated scale and reduction in adverse neonatal outcome is a priority for achieving sustainable development goals.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess the content validity of neonatal near-miss scale in the public health hospitals in Amhara Regional State, northwest Ethiopia.

METHODS: A literature review was performed prior to the development of the neonatal near-miss assessment scale. An expert panel committee was formed by health facility practitioners and by the members of the academia. Two rounds of meetings were conducted with the expert panel to reach consensus on the face and content validity. The content validity index, Kappa statistics, and the content validity ratio were computed to estimate the content validity scale of neonatal near miss.

RESULTS: In this study, four domains (pragmatic, clinical, management, and lab-investigations) with 32 items were identified. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.7 to 1. The overall scale content validity (S-CVI) (average) for the domains (pragmatic, clinical, management, and lab-investigations) were 0.98, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The overall S-CVI (universal) was 0.78 to 1, whereas the overall S-CVI (average) of neonatal near miss assessment scale was found to be 0.96. The content validity ratio and Kappa statistics values ranged from 0.6 to 1 and 0.9 to 1 for the respective domains.

CONCLUSION: The identified four domains and the respective items were valid enough (content-wise) to be used as identification criteria for neonatal near-miss cases. The scale will contribute to neonatal near-miss identification and also improve the quality of neonatal management care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 14, no 1, article id 1983121
Keywords [en]
Domain, expert panel, neonatal near-miss, scale, validation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-39083DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1983121ISI: 000710716200001PubMedID: 34694977Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85118224755OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-39083DiVA, id: diva2:1621229
Available from: 2021-12-17 Created: 2021-12-17 Last updated: 2023-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1009 kB)296 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1009 kBChecksum SHA-512
dec48ea0e40b37cf2eec986bca93bfae0aa83da5e18c42a62a997c65dcf7051591f81bbd3ab55da43591ebc1dc7dd7f550981a8df66ba1fb2414a3bbdce0fecd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Erlandsson, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Erlandsson, Kerstin
By organisation
Sexual Reproductive Perinatal Health
In the same journal
Global Health Action
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 296 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 244 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf