Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Föräldraförsäkringen som verktyg för jämställdhet: En statsvetenskaplig och kvalitativ textanalys av den svenska föräldraförsäkringen
Dalarna University, School of Culture and Society, Political Science.
2022 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Being able to balance work and family life is not only a personal question but a highly political one. The policy is used today and has historically been used as a political tool for achieving higher levels of gender equality. The parental insurance policy in Sweden is often atopic of debate, especially regarding the reserved months and whether to fully individualise the insurance. The purpose of the thesis was to analyse the goals of today’s design of the parental insurance, evaluate to what extent these goals are reached. The thesis also aimed to examine the debate about whether an individualized parental insurance would be a beneficial tool for achieving the political goals of parental insurance. By examining government documents on parental insurance, the results of the study will be discussed in relation to theories of feminist perspectives, New Public Management, goal and result management and welfare state theory. The empirical material consisting of various government publications, motions and debate articles was analysed with an evaluation method and argumentation analysis method. The result of this study showed that there are three main goals of the parental insurance none of which are fully met. The argumentation analysis showed three pro-arguments and 3 contra-arguments. The pro-arguments were deemed as being more scientifically based.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022.
Keywords [sv]
föräldraförsäkring, jämställdhet, politik, individualisering, kvotering, argumentationsanalys, utvärdering, socialförsäkring, mål, policy, kön, New Public Management, mål-och resultatstyrning, feminism, välfärdsstatsteori
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-42930OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-42930DiVA, id: diva2:1706205
Subject / course
Political Science
Available from: 2022-10-25 Created: 2022-10-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 348 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf