Costs and intermediate outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices of midwifery under a MIDWIZE framework in an urban health facility in Nairobi, KenyaShow others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare, ISSN 1877-5756, E-ISSN 1877-5764, Vol. 37, article id 100893Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Three evidence-based midwife-led care practices: dynamic birth positions (DBP), immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) with zero separation between mother and newborn, and delayed cord clamping (DCC), were implemented in four sub-Saharan African countries after an internet-based capacity building program for midwifery leadership in quality improvement (QI). Knowledge on costs of this QI initiative can inform resource mobilization for scale up and sustainability. Methods: We estimated the costs and intermediate outcomes from the implementation of the three evidence-based practices under the midwife-led care (MIDWIZE) framework in a single facility in Kenya through a pre- and post-test implementation design. Daily observations for the level of practice on DBP, SSC and DCC was done at baseline for 1 week and continued during the 11 weeks of the training intervention. Three cost scenarios from the health facility perspective included: scenario 1; staff participation time costs ($515 USD), scenario 2; staff participation time costs plus hired trainer time costs, training material and logistical costs ($1318 USD) and scenario 3; staff participation time costs plus total program costs for the head trainer as the QI leader from the capacity building midwifery program ($8548 USD). Results: At baseline, the level of DBP and SSC practices per the guidelines was at 0 % while that of DCC was at 80 %. After 11 weeks, we observed an adoption of DBP practice of 36 % (N = 111 births), SSC practice of 79 % (N = 241 births), and no change in DCC practice. Major cost driver(s) were midwives’ participation time costs (56 %) for scenario 1 (collaborative), trainers’ material and logistic costs (55 %) in scenario 2(collaborative) and capacity building program costs for the trainer (QI lead) (94 %) in scenario 3 (programmatic). Costs per intermediate outcome were $2.3 USD per birth and $0.5 USD per birth adopting DBP and SSC respectively in Scenario 1; $6.0 USD per birth adopting DBP and $1.4 USD per birth adopting SSC in Scenario 2; $38.5 USD per birth adopting DBP and $8.8 USD per birth adopting SSC in scenario 3. The average hourly wage of the facility midwife was $4.7 USD. Conclusion: Improving adoption of DBP and SSC practices can be done at reasonable facility costs under a collaborative MIDWIZE QI approach. In a programmatic approach, higher facility costs would be needed. This can inform resource mobilization for future QI in similar resource-constrained settings. © 2023
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 37, article id 100893
Keywords [en]
Costs, Evidence-based, Intermediate outcomes, Midwife-led care, MIDWIZE, Quality improvement, Resource mobilization, adoption, article, capacity building, controlled study, delayed cord clamping, health care facility, human, Kenya, leadership, major clinical study, midwife, practice guideline, pretest posttest design, skin, total quality management, urban health
National Category
Nursing Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-46829DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100893ISI: 001063116900001PubMedID: 37586305Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85168236615OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-46829DiVA, id: diva2:1792065
2023-08-282023-08-282023-10-03Bibliographically approved