du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3964-196X
2009 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 18, no 11, p. 1557-1564Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims. One aim was to compare the quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers before and after implementation of an electronic health record in a hospital setting. Another aim was to investigate the use of preformulated templates for pressure ulcer recording in the electronic health record. Background. With the possibilities of the electronic health record to provide information and give accurate and reliable feedback to the healthcare organisation, it is of high priority to develop standardised documentation practices for various areas of care (e.g. such as pressure ulcer care). Design. A cross-sectional retrospective review of health records. Methods. Three departments in a Swedish university hospital participated. In 2002, there were 413 patients, including 59 paper-based records identified with notes on pressure ulcers and in 2006, 343 patients, including 71 electronic health records with pressure ulcer recording. Recorded data on pressure ulcers were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Significantly more patient records showed notes of pressure ulcer grade (p < 0·001), size (p = 0·004), risk assessment (p = 0·002), nursing history (p = 0·040), nursing diagnoses (p < 0·001), nursing goals (p < 0·001) and nursing outcomes (p = 0·016) in 2006 than in 2002. One third of the recordings used preformulated templates. Conclusions. Although there were significant improvements in pressure ulcer recording after the change to the electronic health record, several deficiencies remained. Due to the short time of our follow-up after implementation of the electronic health record, we suspect that the quality of recording will improve when nurses become more familiar with the new system. Relevance to clinical practice. Education related to the use of the electronic health record and evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention should be provided to the nurses. To facilitate documentation, the templates need to be refined to be more user-friendly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell , 2009. Vol. 18, no 11, p. 1557-1564
Keywords [en]
electronic health record, nursing documentation, nursing process, pressure ulcer, record audit
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-3622DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02647.xISI: 000265982000006PubMedID: 19220607OAI: oai:dalea.du.se:3622DiVA, id: diva2:519991
Projects
Trafikantinformation i realtid - nuläge, tekniktrender, innovationer och införandeprocessAvailable from: 2009-01-11 Created: 2009-01-11 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Ehrenberg, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ehrenberg, Anna
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 559 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf