du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of four methods used to estimate population density of moose (Alces alces)
Dalarna University, School of Technology and Business Studies, Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1057-5401
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Wildlife Biology, ISSN 0909-6396, E-ISSN 1903-220X, Vol. 14, no 3, p. 358-371Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Various survey methods are used to monitor and manage ungulate popualations. The choice of optimal method depends on estimation accuracy, management objective and financial constraints. Here we compare estimates produced by four different methods for estimating population size, i.e. aerial counts, hunter observations, pellet group counts and cohort analysis. A Swedish moose Alces alces population was studied during 1973-2005 in the Grimso Wildlife Research Area (135 km(2)). The highest correlation was found between cohort analysis and aerial counts (r = 0.69. P < 0.05). and the hunter observations and the aerial counts (r = 0.76. P < 0.10). The different methods produced relatively consistent trends in population estimates over years. Pellet group counts prior to 1997 were not significantly correlated with the other methods. probably due to unrepresentative spatial sampling. A comparison of the aerial and pellet group counts in 2002 and 2006, showed that the average defecation rate was estimated at approximately 14 pellet groups per day per moose. Our results show the importance of having representative spatial sampling in pellet group surveys and indicate that hunter observations can be a useful tool for estimating long-term population trends even in moderately sized areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 14, no 3, p. 358-371
Keyword [en]
arterial count; cohort analysis; deer; hunter observations; management; monitoring; pellet group counts
National Category
Biological Sciences Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-3665DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[358:EOFMUT]2.0.CO;2ISI: 000260409700009OAI: oai:dalea.du.se:3665DiVA, id: diva2:519996
Available from: 2009-01-30 Created: 2009-01-30 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Rönnegård, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rönnegård, Lars
By organisation
Statistics
In the same journal
Wildlife Biology
Biological SciencesMathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 517 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf