du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Drivers’ propensity to install different types of intelligent speed adaptation systems in their cars
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4715-8935
2010 (English)In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, ISSN 1369-8478, Vol. 13, no 3, 206-214 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the present study was to examine if there are differences in drivers’ propensity to have different types of intelligent speed adaptation installed in their cars depending on the sample of drivers (i.e. Swedish or Turkish), their aberrant driving behaviours (i.e. violations and errors), and/or the technical solution used (i.e. speed limit information, advisory, supportive and intervening systems). A sample of 224 Swedish and 316 Turkish drivers completed a questionnaire including questions based on the driver behaviour questionnaire (DBQ) as well as questions about the drivers’ propensity to have different types of intelligent speed adaptation installed in their cars. The results showed that the Swedish sample of drivers was less positive than the Turkish sample of drivers towards having the advisory, supportive and intervening systems installed. Furthermore, drivers who frequently commit violations were less positive towards having any of these systems installed than were drivers who commit violations less frequently, while drivers who frequently make errors were more positive towards having the systems installed than were drivers who make errors less frequently. Both the Swedish and the Turkish sample of drivers were most positive towards having the speed limit information system installed, followed by the advisory system on second place, the supportive system on third place and lastly the intervening system on fourth place.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2010. Vol. 13, no 3, 206-214 p.
Keyword [en]
Intelligent speed adaptation Driver behaviour questionnaire, Violations, Errors, Speeding
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-5433DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.005OAI: oai:dalea.du.se:5433DiVA: diva2:520343
Available from: 2011-03-14 Created: 2011-03-14 Last updated: 2015-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Warner, Henriette Wallén
By organisation
Psychology
In the same journal
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 503 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf