Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ellipsis as a marker of interaction in spoken discourse
Dalarna University, School of Humanities and Media Studies, English. (Kultur, identitet och gestaltning)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0128-3770
2013 (English)In: Research in Language, ISSN 2083-4616, Vol. 11, no 3, p. 251-276Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we discuss strategies for interaction in spoken discourse, focusing on ellipsis phenomena in English. The data comes from the VOICE corpus of English as a Lingua Franca, and we analyse education data in the form of seminar and workshop discussions, working group meetings, interviews and conversations. The functions ellipsis carries in the data are Intersubjectivity, where participants develop and maintain an understanding in discourse; Continuers, which are examples of back channel support; Correction, both self- and other-initiated; Repetition; and Comments, which are similar to Continuers but do not have a back channel support function. We see that the first of these, Intersubjectivity, is by far the most popular, followed by Repetitions and Comments. These results are explained as consequences of the nature of the texts themselves, as some are discussions of presentations and so can be expected to contain many Repetitions, for example. The speech event is also an important factor, as events with asymmetrical power relations like interviews do not contain so many Continuers. Our clear conclusion is that the use of ellipsis is a strong marker of interaction in spoken discourse.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Walter de Gruyter, 2013. Vol. 11, no 3, p. 251-276
Keywords [en]
interaction; ellipsis; oral language; corpus
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Research Profiles 2009-2020, Intercultural Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-13447DOI: 10.2478/v10015-012-0020-xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-84895155187OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-13447DiVA, id: diva2:676950
Note

Open access

Available from: 2013-12-08 Created: 2013-12-08 Last updated: 2021-11-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(335 kB)588 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 335 kBChecksum SHA-512
f73a1b2c2e8a04ef0f744c69cdd9649c4f8929e33159991bf9736ab83843495635988d1f71312a2c493cfe5a8890fff9f87c4622586665cc1dd18d562a153978
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

White, Jonathan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
White, Jonathan
By organisation
English
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 588 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 961 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf