du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol by physicians and midwives at district level in Uganda: a randomised controlled equivalence trial
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8947-2949
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: The Lancet, ISSN 0140-6736, E-ISSN 1474-547X, Vol. 385, no 9985, 2392-2398 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is established for the treatment of incomplete abortion but has not been systematically assessed when provided by midwives at district level in a low-resource setting. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of midwives diagnosing and treating incomplete abortion with misoprostol, compared with physicians.

METHODS: We did a multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial at district level at six facilities in Uganda. Eligibility criteria were women with signs of incomplete abortion. We randomly allocated women with first-trimester incomplete abortion to clinical assessment and treatment with misoprostol either by a physician or a midwife. The randomisation (1:1) was done in blocks of 12 and was stratified for study site. Primary outcome was complete abortion not needing surgical intervention within 14-28 days after initial treatment. The study was not masked. Analysis of the primary outcome was done on the per-protocol population with a generalised linear-mixed effects model. The predefined equivalence range was -4% to 4%. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01844024.

FINDINGS: From April 30, 2013, to July 21, 2014, 1108 women were assessed for eligibility. 1010 women were randomly assigned to each group (506 to midwife group and 504 to physician group). 955 women (472 in the midwife group and 483 in the physician group) were included in the per-protocol analysis. 452 (95·8%) of women in the midwife group had complete abortion and 467 (96·7%) in the physician group. The model-based risk difference for midwife versus physician group was -0·8% (95% CI -2·9 to 1·4), falling within the predefined equivalence range (-4% to 4%). The overall proportion of women with incomplete abortion was 3·8% (36/955), similarly distributed between the two groups (4·2% [20/472] in the midwife group, 3·3% [16/483] in the physician group). No serious adverse events were recorded.

INTERPRETATION: Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol by midwives is equally safe and effective as when provided by physicians, in a low-resource setting. Scaling up midwives' involvement in treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol at district level would increase access to safe post-abortion care.

FUNDING: The Swedish Research Council, Karolinska Institutet, and Dalarna University.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 385, no 9985, 2392-2398 p.
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-17312DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61935-8ISI: 000356003700032PubMedID: 25817472OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-17312DiVA: diva2:806796
Available from: 2015-04-21 Created: 2015-04-21 Last updated: 2016-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(240 kB)34 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 240 kBChecksum SHA-512
b69ec4a94fb692cfbb0554476a5b0bad77ded121e9d2af0802a8d92e3fd97434585d788190e706f86f1c9b135594e91202f98ac568f46368963a3059cb8c4415
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
fulltext(106 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 106 kBChecksum SHA-512
9f732bdc675e844031b52a5331d9bba075a19594ee453f54938a3c4ec924155e5904e72dc79c1f77ad0c1718d2378e88598edff099eccde56720b6c6ebad215b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
fulltext(87 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 87 kBChecksum SHA-512
0bb0f93ee2bb74f302e42c25e87b4d0bfe1fe886cfe7c73a42867e220309226dc7d27a6590b79b55a7bc6fc86d43f9e0903bd5f69bc5d4d3258786917d780ad7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
The Lancet
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 57 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 468 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf