du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors that influence collaboration between psychiatric care and CSSs: Experiences of working together in the interest of persons with long-term mental illness living in the community
Ersta Sköndal University College.
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing.
2009 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 23, no 1, 140-145 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Since de-institutionalization of psychiatric care (PC) took place in Sweden during the second half of the 20th century, the intended collaboration between the two organizations, PC and community social service (CSS) has been evaluated as inadequate in providing care for persons with long-term mental illness living in the community.

Aim: The aim of this explorative study was to examine factors that influence interdisciplinary teamwork between PC and CSSs based on the experience of nursing staff within two separate organizations.

Method: Five focus groups were selected as an appropriate method to collect data. Two of these groups were recruited from the PC and three from the CSSs. The focus groups consisted of psychiatric nurses and mental healthcare workers. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify major themes in the data.

Findings: Two main themes were found, external organizational factors and interpersonal factors that deter or enhance collaboration between PC and CSS. Separate care plans, unclear times for meetings were found to be a plausible reason for communication failure. The focus groups representing each of the two organizations viewed themselves as 'us and them'. Different ideologies and goals for caring and service and how to use each other's competence seemed to be explanations as well as consequences of not finding ways to work together.

Conclusion: The results of this study points to the need for the two organizations to find ways to work more effectively together to realize a joint responsibility for the patient/client. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 23, no 1, 140-145 p.
Keyword [en]
Collaboration, Community social service, Focus groups, Interpersonal factors, Long-term mental illness, Organizational factors, Psychiatric care, Qualitative content analysis, article, cooperation, human, information processing, interdisciplinary communication, long term care, mental disease, mental health service, psychiatric nursing, social adaptation, Sweden, Community Mental Health Services, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Long-Term Care, Mental Disorders, Social Adjustment
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-19615DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00600.xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-60449116093OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-19615DiVA: diva2:860836
Available from: 2015-10-14 Created: 2015-10-06 Last updated: 2015-10-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lützen, Kim
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 304 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf