du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ukrainas konstitutionella sicksackande: Regimförändring och partiutveckling under semipresidentialism
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6594-5804
2016 (Swedish)In: Nordisk Østforum, ISSN 0801-7220, E-ISSN 1891-1773, Vol. 30, no 1, 18-37 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ukraine has repeatedly shifted between the two sub-types of semi-presidentialism, i.e. between premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism. The aim of this article is to discuss to what extent theoretical arguments against premier-presidential and president-parliamentary systems are relevant for understanding the shifting directions of the Ukrainian regime. As a point of departure, I formulate three main claims from the literature: 1) “President-parliamentarism is less conducive to democratization than premier-presidentialism.”; 2) “Semi-presidentialism in both its variants have built-in incitements for intra-executive conflict between the president and the prime minister.”; 3) “Semi-presidentialism in general, and president-parliamentarism in particular, encourages presidentialization of political parties.” I conclude from the study’s empirical overview that the president-parliamentary system– the constitutional arrangement with the most dismal record of democratization – has been instrumental in strengthening presidential dominance and authoritarian tendencies. The premier-presidential period 2006–2010 was by no means smooth and stable, but the presidential dominance weakened and the survival of the government was firmly anchored in the parliament. During this period, there were also indications of a gradual strengthening of institutional capacity among the main political parties and the parliament began to emerge as a significant political arena.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo: NOASP , 2016. Vol. 30, no 1, 18-37 p.
Keyword [en]
semi-presidentialism, premier-presidentialism, president-parliamentarism, party, presidentialization, president, prime minister, parliament, democratization, Ukraine
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Intercultural Studies, Semipresidentialism och regeringskapacitet i transitionsländer
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-20806DOI: 10.17585/nof.v30.389OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-20806DiVA: diva2:895569
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2014-1260
Available from: 2016-01-19 Created: 2016-01-19 Last updated: 2016-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(254 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 254 kBChecksum SHA-512
aed3279130de42f6bf9943bc446df46e9d4b48a81e5c3df8572f8d1af9714716701bbef09fa4ef11228bb7f9b55d185e1757f4f29c60ef6228af5f89343ea34f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sedelius, Thomas
By organisation
Political Science
In the same journal
Nordisk Østforum
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 524 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf