This case study examines the immigrant group of global nomads who live, or have
lived, in London, with specific focus on how they are able to operate outside the UK
state’s political system, and if this challenges the concept of the system of state
politics. The study uses textual analyses of multiple identities, as well as social
identity theory and constructivist theory, to explain how global nomads can deflect
political conflict such as immigrant discrimination as perpetrated by the state, and can
choose not to interact with the political system unless necessary.
Global nomads in London are scrutinised through first hand accounts provided
in interviews cited in literature, and through literature dedicated to different types of
global nomads who share common traits despite some differences. The UK
government’s stance, during the past fifteen years, is analysed and is considered to be
a potential source of conflict towards immigrants including the global nomads. The
research finds that global nomads can live in London choosing not to interact with the
political system because of their multicultural understanding, fluid identity and
professional status, and temporary residential status, and therefore finds that the
concept of the system of state politics is being challenged.
2016.
Global nomad, cosmopolitan social democracy, state, multiculturalism, identity, immigrant