du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Accounting and Auditing of Sustainability: Sustainable Indicator Accounting (SIA)
Högskolan i Gävle.
Dalarna University, School of Technology and Business Studies, Business Administration and Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5043-6289
Högskolan i Gävle.
2017 (English)In: Sustainability: The Journal of Record, ISSN 1937-0695, Vol. 10, no 1, 45-52 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With sustainability reporting commonplace and mandatory in the E.U., a model to facilitate accumulation and assurance of sustainability information is needed. Currently, only limited assurance is possible, and comparability among reporting companies and over time is difficult if not impossible. Current standards of the U.S. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), while a good start, are not sufficiently broad. The current financial reporting framework, while not appropriate for sustainability, provides a basis for a sustainability accounting and auditing model by considering objectives, postulates, consolidation, and sustainability indicators for sustainability accounting. 

The overall focus of sustainability accounting and assurance is risk assessment, which is based on sustainability from the perspective of all stakeholders—financial, social, environmental, and technological—and management of the risk.

Assumptions of sustainability accounting are developed from postulates of financial accounting and include:

  • Continuity. Reports assume business continuity sufficient to meet sustainability objectives and requirements, including product disposal and environmental cleanup.
  • Entity. Includes all activities that affect sustainability of an organization’s activities, goods, and services including suppliers, transport, disposal and cleanup.
  • Period.  Reporting period covers product life cycle, from raw materials extraction through disposal and cleanup.
  • Measurement unit. Varies for each sustainability indicator.

The reporting entity includes consolidated groups as well as disaggregation by product group, country, parts of the organization over which it has direct control and others over which it has indirect control such as suppliers, disposal organizations. The framework and model can be reviewed for independent assurance, and are comparable over time and among reporting entities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert, 2017. Vol. 10, no 1, 45-52 p.
Keyword [en]
Sustainability accounting postulates, risk managment, going concern, indicator, SIA
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Complex Systems – Microdata Analysis
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-21343DOI: 10.1089/sus.2017.29080.afOAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-21343DiVA: diva2:917267
Available from: 2016-04-06 Created: 2016-04-06 Last updated: 2017-02-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/sus.2017.29080.af

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hartwig, Fredrik
By organisation
Business Administration and Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 757 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf