du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of system improvements in solar thermal and air source heat pump combisystems
Dalarna University, School of Technology and Business Studies, Energy Technology. KTH. (SERC)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3201-8518
Dalarna University, School of Technology and Business Studies, Energy Technology. (SERC)
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 173, 606-623 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A solar thermal and heat pump combisystem is one of many system alternatives on the market for supplying domestic hot water (DHW) and space heating (SH) in dwellings. In this study a reference solar thermal and air source heat pump combisystem was defined and modelled based on products available on the market. Based on the results of an extensive literature survey, several system variations were investigated to show the influence of heat pump cycle, thermal storage and system integration on the use of electricity for two houses in the climates of Zurich and Carcassonne. A singular economic cash flow analysis was carried out and the “additional investment limit” of each system variation was determined for a range of economic boundary conditions. This is the maximum extra investment cost for the system variant compared to the reference system that will give a break even result for a 10 year period. The results show that variations in electricity price affects the additional investment limit far more than the other economic parameters. Several of the variants show potential for achieving a cost benefit, but the potential varies a lot depending on load and climate boundary conditions. For all variants, the biggest difference in electricity savings was found for Zurich rather than in Carcassonne, which is explained by the larger heating load. However, in three cases the largest savings were for the SFH45 house despite the fact that the annual electricity use of the system is much lower than that for the SFH100 house, 3581 kW h/year compared to 8340 kW h/year. This was attributed to the fact that, in these cases, the operating level of the space heating circuit played a significant role, the SFH45 house being supplied with a 35/30 °C heating system while the SFH100 was supplied with a 55/45 °C heating system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 173, 606-623 p.
Keyword [en]
Solar combisystem; Heat pump cycle; Thermal storage; Hydraulics
National Category
Energy Systems
Research subject
Energy, Forests and Built Environments, MacSheep
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-21378DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.048ISI: 000377235200050OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-21378DiVA: diva2:922155
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme
Available from: 2016-04-22 Created: 2016-04-22 Last updated: 2016-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Poppi, StefanoBales, ChrisCialani, Catia
By organisation
Energy TechnologyEconomics
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 472 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf