TY - JOUR M3 - article TI - Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care : A systematic literature review AU - Lipson-Smith, R. AU - Pflaumer, L. AU - Elf, Marie AU - Blaschke, S. -M AU - Davis, A. AU - White, M. AU - Zeeman, H. AU - Bernhardt, J. Y1 - 2021/// PY - 2021 DA - 2021 KW - health services administration & management KW - rehabilitation medicine KW - stroke medicine KW - adult KW - built environment KW - caregiver KW - Cinahl KW - clinical outcome KW - clinical practice KW - controlled study KW - data extraction KW - drug safety KW - eligibility criteria KW - environmental enrichment KW - female KW - hospital patient KW - human KW - male KW - Medline KW - motivation KW - narrative KW - outcome assessment KW - quality control KW - quantitative analysis KW - rehabilitation KW - review KW - Scopus KW - stroke rehabilitation KW - stroke survivor KW - synthesis KW - systematic review KW - Web of Science KW - wellbeing KW - cerebrovascular accident KW - Caregivers KW - Humans KW - Inpatients KW - Stroke JF - BMJ Open T2 - BMJ Open KW - Health Sciences KW - Hälsovetenskaper VL - 11 IS - 8 C7 - e050247 PB - BMJ Publishing Group Ltd SN - 20446055 (EISSN) AD - Caring Science/Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University C2 - 34353805 DB - DiVA DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050247 AB - Objectives To identify, appraise and synthesise existing design evidence for inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; to identify impacts of these built environments on the outcomes and experiences of people recovering from stroke, their family/caregivers and staff. Design A convergent segregated review design was used to conduct a systematic review. Data sources Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for articles published between January 2000 and November 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies investigating the impact of the built environment of inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke survivors, their family/caregivers and/or staff. Data extraction and synthesis Two authors separately completed the title, abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Extracted data were categorised according to the aspect of the built environment explored and the outcomes reported. These categories were used to structure a narrative synthesis of the results from all included studies. Results Twenty-four articles were included, most qualitative and exploratory. Half of the included articles investigated a particular aspect of the built environment, including environmental enrichment and communal areas (n=8), bedroom design (n=3) and therapy spaces (n=1), while the other half considered the environment in general. Findings related to one or more of the following outcome categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) patient activity, (3) patient well-being, (4) patient and/or staff safety and (5) clinical practice. Heterogeneous designs and variables of interest meant results could not be compared, but some repeated findings suggest that attractive and accessible communal areas are important for patient activity and well-being. Conclusions Stroke rehabilitation is a unique healthcare context where patient activity, practice and motivation are paramount. We found many evidence gaps that with more targeted research could better inform the design of rehabilitation spaces to optimise care. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. LA - eng Y2 - 2021-09-10T15:40:23.797+02:00 N1 - 2023-08-28T15:04:38.818+02:00 L1 - http://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1593170/FULLTEXT01.pdf L2 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050247 UR - http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-38055 ER -