du.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 53
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Antonsson, Jenny
    et al.
    Falu kommun.
    Kaufmann, Bruno
    Falu kommun.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Parkhouse, Anna
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Falu dialogguide: En vägledning till medborgardialog2017Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 2.
    Axelson, Tomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Humanities and Media Studies, Religious Studies.
    Hansson, Ulf
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Stier, Jonas (Editor)
    Dalarna University, School of Humanities and Media Studies.
    Från privatsak till politisk kraft?: Borlänges interreligiösa råd och förväntningar på religion som resurs i lokalsamhället2018Report (Other academic)
  • 3.
    Axelson, Tomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Humanities and Media Studies, Religious Studies.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Den komplexa frågan kring religionens roll2018In: Dala-Demokraten, ISSN 1103-9183, no 7 febArticle in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 4. Berglund, Sten
    et al.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Turning the Clock Backwards?: Hybrid Regime Dynamics in Post-Orange Ukraine2011In: Nordic Political Science Association (NOPSA), Vasa Finland, 2011Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Choudhry, Sujit
    et al.
    Center for Constitutional Transitions.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Kyrychenko, Julia
    Center for Policy and Legal Reform.
    Semi-presidentialism and Inclusive Governance in Ukraine: Reflections for Constitutional Reform2018Report (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This report assesses the ways in which the semi-presidential form of government can be best structured to promote stable, democratic and inclusive governance in Ukraine.

    Constitutional stability in Ukraine has faced four main challenges: (a) recurring institutional conflict among the president, legislature and government; (b) a presidency that has fallen prey to autocratic tendencies; (c) a fragmented and weak party system that has undermined the capacity of the legislature to act coherently; and (d) a weak constitutional culture and a weak Constitutional Court.

    The report presents comparative knowledge from other semi-presidential systems, and reflections on the Ukrainian context, which could benefit a wide range of stakeholders, such as legislators, policy advisors, think tanks and civil society. It is based on an earlier report, Semi-Presidentialism as Power Sharing: Constitutional Reform after the Arab Spring, co-published by International IDEA and the Center for Constitutional Transitions in 2014.

  • 6. Duvold, Kjetil
    et al.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Alternatives to Democracy: The Resilience of Elitist and Authoritarian Preferences in Central and Eastern Europe2004In: Central Europe Beyond Double Enlargement / [ed] Jankauskas, Algimantas, Vilnius: Lithuanian Political Science Association , 2004Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Duvold, Kjetil
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Between Institutions and Personalities: Determinants of Trust in the Baltic Presidents2017Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In several political systems, presidents may benefit from the image of being disassociated from a single party and, in a slightly Gaullist manner, project themselves as above-party politics and remain somewhat elevated from the usual political mud-slinging (Sedelius 2004). In the Baltic states, there have been – 25 years after national independence –relatively few presidents and, hence, the institution represents greater continuity than parliamentary politics. For many years, the Baltic presidents enjoyed greater levels of trust than other political actors, such as parties, MPs and PMs (Duvold 2006). Still, the greater popularity of the presidents, as compared with prime ministers and parliamentarians, undoubtedly owes something to the very limits on their governmental powers: the presidents are not closely associated with unpopular economic decisions or with the day-to-day partisan squabbling in parliament (Duvold and Sedelius 2004). Some of them have, on the contrary, acted as mediators during potentially damaging conflicts. In fact, their position may allow them to act as spokesmen for popular discontent (Baylis, 1996, 304). 

    Drawing on a collection of public opinion surveys conducted in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 2001–2014, this paper deals with two main questions: 1) Has trust in the Baltic presidents increased or decreased over time and and to what extent does trust in the president follow trust in other institutions? 2) What are the determinants of trust in the presidents? To what extent can it be explained in terms of background variables, such as age, socio-economic position or ethnic belonging; by political performance and satisfaction; by attitudes towards the current political regimes; or by a sense of belonging to the country and its society?

  • 8.
    Ekman, Joakim
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola.
    Linde, Jonas
    Universitetet i Bergen.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Demokratiseringsprocesser: Nya perspektiv och utmaningar2014 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
  • 9. Ekman, Joakim
    et al.
    Linde, Jonas
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Hybridregimer: Förändrade förutsättningar för demokrati och demokratibistånd2007In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 109, no 2, p. 133-137Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Hämberg, Eva
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Social Work. Örebro universitet.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Inspection of social services in Sweden: a comparative analysis of the use and adjustment of standards2016In: Nordic Social Work Research, ISSN 2156-857X, E-ISSN 2156-8588, Vol. 6, no 2, p. 138-151Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Inspection has increasingly been regarded as a safeguard for promoting quality of social services. Little attention has, however, been given to the impact of standards used in inspections, i.e. the written norms, rules and principles used for identification and judgment. The aim of this study is to empirically contribute to an improved understanding of how standards in inspection of social service are designed, and to what extent the design is adjusted in relation to different kind of social services. We employ a systematic and comparative analysis of the content (in terms of input, process, output and outcome aspects) and precision (low, medium and high) of 186 paragraphs derived from legislation and referred to as standards in inspection decisions concerning two types of social work: Investigation, Assessment and Decision-Making (IAD); and Treatment Intervention (TI) in Sweden 2012. Contrary to expectations based on an inspection ideal, our findings show that paragraphs covering outcome aspects are not more commonly referred to as standards in TI than in IAD inspection. The analysis of the precision also indicates that the standards used in inspection of TI are not more adjusted to complex and subjectively experienced aspects than are the standards used in IAD. Our overall results indicate that the policy instrument is primarily adapted to IAD inspection rather than to TI inspection.

  • 11.
    Lundberg, Erik
    et al.
    Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    National Linkages and Ambiguous EU Approaches among European Civil Society Organisations2014In: Journal of Contemporary European Research, ISSN 1815-347X, E-ISSN 1815-347X, Vol. 10, no 3, p. 322-336Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    University of Tampere.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Decision-Making in Foreign and Security Policies and EU Affairs2019In: Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 127-150Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter investigates leadership in foreign and security policy and European Union (EU) affairs, examining decision-making and division of labor between the president and the prime minister. In order to grasp the complexity of intra-executive policy coordination in these areas, it highlights the interdependence between foreign and EU policies. The chapter shows that intra-executive coordination is most developed in foreign and security policy and that Finland, Lithuania, and Romania normally manage to speak with one voice in external relations. It also provides evidence of constitutional rules about jurisdictions bending in favor of presidents. This applies particularly to representation in the European Council.

  • 13.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    University of Tampere.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Formal Coordination Mechanisms2019In: Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 79-91Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter examines formal intra-executive coordination mechanisms such as joint meetings between the president and the prime minister, joint councils or ministerial committees, and administrative coordination between the offices of the president and the prime minister. It uncovers the status and legal basis of such instruments and explores how they have evolved in Finland, Lithuania, and Romania since the 1990s. It shows strong and systematic variation between the three countries, with Finland displaying a high level of formal coordination. In Lithuania and Romania, on the other hand, such coordination mechanisms are considerably weaker and more dependent on individual office-holders.

  • 14.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    University of Tampere.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Informal Avenues of Influence2019In: Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 93-126Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter focuses on the actual coordination and decision-making between the president and the prime minister. The analysis covers agenda-setting initiatives, public opinion and party system dynamics, and the way formal prerogatives are interpreted into praxis, as well as how the key actors approach coordination where there is no explicit constitutional or judicial guidance. The findings confirm that lack of written rules or otherwise strong norms guiding intra-executive coordination opens the door for presidential activism (Lithuania and particularly Romania), whereas under stronger coordination mechanisms, presidents are in turn more constrained and constructively involved in decision-making (Finland).

  • 15.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    University of Tampere.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Institutions, Coordination, and Leadership2019In: Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 19-44Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter contains the theoretical framework the study in this book is based on. Embedded in institutional theory and building on four strands of literature—semi-presidentialism, public administration, political leadership, and foreign policy analysis—it highlights the role of institutions in facilitating successful policy-making. It outlines key concepts and findings from institutional theory before moving more specifically to the incentives that presidents and prime ministers have for engaging in intra-executive cooperation. The specific challenges related to leadership in foreign and security policy, including European Union affairs, are emphasized. The chapter identifies various intra-executive coordination mechanisms and puts forward a theoretical framework for the subsequent empirical chapters.

  • 16.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    Tampere University.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Presidents and Cabinets: Coordinating Executive Leadership in Premier-Presidential Regimes2019In: Political Studies Review, ISSN 1478-9299, E-ISSN 1478-9302Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    A key factor of semi-presidential regimes is power-sharing mechanisms between president and government. Influenced by Shugart and Carey’s seminal work on premier-presidential regimes, this article addresses intra-executive dynamics in light of recent scholarship on the risks and consequences associated with conflict and cooperation between the president and the cabinet. Through an in-depth comparison of three premier-presidential systems with broadly similar constitutional designs, Finland, Lithuania, and Romania, it forces us to reconsider how coordination mechanisms and political context shape presidential influence. Absent of a working constitutional division of labour and established modes of intra-executive coordination, presidents are more likely to use alternative channels of influence – such as the strategy of ‘going public’ or direct contacts with political parties, the legislature, or civil society stakeholders – and to intervene in questions falling under the competence of the government. Lack of institutionalized coordination also benefits the presidents as they hold the initiative regarding cooperation between the two executives.  

  • 17. Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadeship2020Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This book explores how power-sharing between the president and the prime minister works in semi-presidential regimes. In contrast to much of the existing comparative work on semi-presidentialism, the book emphasizes the role of institutional coordination at the most concrete level of executive policy-making, and asks how institutional coordination between the president and prime minister influences presidential activism and the balance of power within the executive. The authors develop a tentative framework embedded in institutionalism and based on four strands of research – semi-presidentialism, public administration, political leadership, and foreign policy analysis – which is subsequently applied to the cases of Lithuania, Romania and Finland. Given the political challenges facing many semi-presidential countries, the study ultimately seeks to identify institutional solutions that facilitate power-sharing and successful policy-making.

  • 18.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    University of Tampere.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Shifting Power-Centres of Semi-Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania2019In: Government and Opposition, ISSN 0017-257X, E-ISSN 1477-7053, Vol. 54, no 4, p. 637-660Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Despite more than two decades of research on semi-presidential regimes, we still know very little about the actual coordination between the president and the prime minister. Through an in-depth analysis of Lithuanian semi-presidentialism, this article underscores the importance of institutional design on intra-executive balance of power. Drawing primarily on interviews with top-level civil servants and office-holders, it argues that in the absence of written rules or other strong norms guiding intra-executive coordination, presidents enjoy more discretion in designing their own modes of operation. Coordination depends on the initiative of the president, with ad hoc practices further weakening the position of the prime minister. While Lithuanian semi-presidentialism has functioned smoothly, the personality-centred politics commonly found in Central and East European countries create favourable conditions for presidential activism.

  • 19.
    Raunio, Tapio
    et al.
    Tampere University.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    The Semi-Presidential Cases in Comparative Context2019In: Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 45-77Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter sets Finland, Lithuania, and Romania in a comparative context of semi-presidentialism in Europe. It justifies the selection of cases by including them in a broader set of semi-presidential regimes and uses this comparison to provide a range of basic and institutional data for setting the stage for the subsequent chapters on executive coordination. It provides key indicators on semi-presidential subtypes (premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism): level of democracy, presidential power, intra-executive conflict, and cohabitation. Drawing on public opinion surveys, it also assesses general levels of institutional trust with an emphasis on public support for the presidency.

  • 20.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Demokrati eller presidentdiktatur?: Konstitutionella vägval i postkommunistiska länder2008In: Nordisk Østforum, ISSN 0801-7220, E-ISSN 1891-1773, Vol. 22, no 2, p. 141-161Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    While authoritarian presidents prevail under heavily president-oriented constitutions throughout the post-Soviet region, democracy along parliamentary lines triumphs in Central Europe. This article discusses the constitutional pattern among the post-communist countries on the basis of two general questions: First, how can we explain why strong presidential constitutions dominate throughout the post-Soviet region whereas constrained presidencies and governments anchored in parliament have become the prevailing option in Central Europe? Second, and interlinked with the first question, why have so many post-communist countries (in the post-Soviet region as well as in Central Europe) chosen neither parliamentarism nor presidentialism, but instead semi-presidential arrangements whereby a directly elected president is provided with considerable powers and coexists with a prime minister? The analysis indicates that both historical-institutional and actor-oriented factors are relevant here. Key factors have been regime transition, pre-communist era constitutions and leaders, as well as short-term economic and political considerations. With differing strengths and in partly different ways, these factors seem to have affected the actors’ preferences and final constitutional compromises.

  • 21.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Dilemmas of Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe2008In: Nordic Political Science Association (NOPSA) Conference, Tromsö, 2008Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Från sovjetrepublik till presidentdiktatur2008In: Samtidigt i Vitryssland / [ed] Eriksson, Ulrika, Stockholm: KIC , 2008Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Individer, inte partier!: Politikens presidentialisering och starka politiska ledare2010In: Politik, protest, populism: Deltagande på nya villkor / [ed] Ekman, Joakim; Linde, Jonas, Malmö: Liber , 2010, p. 225-252Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Issues of Regime Change and Semi-Presidentialism in Ukraine2014Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Party presidentialization in Ukraine2015In: The presidentialization of political parties: organizations, institutions and leaders / [ed] Gianluca Passarelli, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, p. 124-141Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This book considers why the level of party presidentialization varies from one country to another, and how constitutional structures and party genetics affect both the level and the degree it is present. Presenting an international collection of case studies from the US, Latin America, Australia, Japan and Europe, including France, Italy, Germany, Poland and the Ukraine, it examines how the presence of presidential features in political parties varies in terms of the constitutional framework. Highlights the importance of institutions in political life, the case studies provide empirical evidence that no stable presidentialization is possible outside regimes where a presidential dynamic is introduced by the institutions.

  • 26.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Presidentmakt och parlamentarism i Östeuropa2009In: Det nya Östeuropa - stat och nation i förändring / [ed] Björklund, Fredrika; Rodin, Johnny, Lund: Studentlitteratur , 2009, p. 379-408Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Pro-premiär eller pro-president?: Om distinktionen mellan parlamentarism, presidentialism och semi-presidentialism2002In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 105, no 4, p. 273-295Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Propremiar or pro-president? On the distinction between parliamentarism, presitentialism and semi-presidentialism. From comparative research on the constitutional development in Central and Eastern Europe and also from the longstanding debate on whether parliamentarism or presidentialism best facilitates democracy, it is apparent that there has been and continues to be, a certain degree of confusion concerning the concepts of semi-presidentialism and presidentialism. Different scholars mean different things by the terms and therefore classify countries differently. In this article I argue that the conceptual dichotomy between pro-premiär (premier-presidentialism) and pro-president systems (presidentparliamentary systems) provide the best solution to several of the problems related to categorising constitutional types, most importantly perhaps to the presidential power dilemma. I, furthermore, employ these concepts on the post-communist constitutional systems and try to reveal patterns with regard to presidential power, geographical region and democratisation.

  • 28.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Recension av Russisk Politikk2014In: Nordisk Østforum, ISSN 0801-7220, E-ISSN 1891-1773, Vol. 28, no 2Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Regime Dynamics and Semi-Presidentialism in Ukraine2014Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 30.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Review: Cohabitation and conflicting politics in French policymaking2016In: West European Politics, ISSN 0140-2382, E-ISSN 1743-9655, Vol. 39, no 4, p. 905-906Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 31.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Semi-Presidential Perils: Trends and Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Eastern Europe2009In: Statsvetenskapliga förbundets årsmöte 2009, Örebro, 2009Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Semi-presidential shifts in Ukraine: institutional perils and party presidentialization2015Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 33.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Semi-Presidentialism and Governability in Transitional Regimes: Final Project Report2019Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This report summarises general findings and lists the bulk of publications of a three year project "Semi-Presidentialism and Governability in Transitional Regimes" financed by the Swedish Research Council and Dalarna University 2015-2018. The report also includes an abstract in Swedish. A final and signed version of this report was submitted to the Swedish Research Council by early March 2019.

  • 34.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    The Tug-of-War between Presidents and Prime Ministers: Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe2006Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    The Tug-of-War between Presidents and Prime Ministers: Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe2008Book (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Ukrainas konstitutionella sicksackande: Regimförändring och partiutveckling under semipresidentialism2016In: Nordisk Østforum, ISSN 0801-7220, E-ISSN 1891-1773, Vol. 30, no 1, p. 18-37Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Ukraine has repeatedly shifted between the two sub-types of semi-presidentialism, i.e. between premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism. The aim of this article is to discuss to what extent theoretical arguments against premier-presidential and president-parliamentary systems are relevant for understanding the shifting directions of the Ukrainian regime. As a point of departure, I formulate three main claims from the literature: 1) “President-parliamentarism is less conducive to democratization than premier-presidentialism.”; 2) “Semi-presidentialism in both its variants have built-in incitements for intra-executive conflict between the president and the prime minister.”; 3) “Semi-presidentialism in general, and president-parliamentarism in particular, encourages presidentialization of political parties.” I conclude from the study’s empirical overview that the president-parliamentary system– the constitutional arrangement with the most dismal record of democratization – has been instrumental in strengthening presidential dominance and authoritarian tendencies. The premier-presidential period 2006–2010 was by no means smooth and stable, but the presidential dominance weakened and the survival of the government was firmly anchored in the parliament. During this period, there were also indications of a gradual strengthening of institutional capacity among the main political parties and the parliament began to emerge as a significant political arena.

  • 37.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Berglund, Sten
    Örebro universitet.
    Towards Presidential Rule in Ukraine: Hybrid Regime Dynamics under Semi-Presidentialism2012In: Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, ISSN 2029-0454, Vol. 5, no 1, p. 20-45Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article sets out to analyse recent regime developments in Ukraine in relation to semi-presidentialism. The article asks: to what extent and in what ways theoretical arguments against semi-presidentialism (premier-presidential and president-parliamentary systems) are relevant for understanding the changing directions of the Ukrainian regime since the 1990s? The article also reviews the by now overwhelming evidence suggesting that President Yanukovych is turning Ukraine into a more authoritarian hybrid regime and raises the question to what extent the president-parliamentary system might serve this end. The article argues that both kinds of semi-presidentialism have, in different ways, exacerbated rather than mitigated institutional conflict and political stalemate. The return to the president-parliamentary system in 2010 – the constitutional arrangement with the most dismal record of democratisation – was a step in the wrong direction. The premier-presidential regime was by no means ideal, but it had at least two advantages. It weakened the presidential dominance and it explicitly anchored the survival of the government in parliament. The return to the 1996 constitution ties in well with the notion that President Viktor Yanukovych has embarked on an outright authoritarian path.

  • 38.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Ekman, Joakim
    Intra-Executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe2010In: Government and Opposition, ISSN 0017-257X, E-ISSN 1477-7053, Vol. 45, no 4, p. 505-530Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 39.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Eriksson, Charli
    Politiska utmaningar: Demokratienkäten 20042010In: Partnerskap för hållbar välfärdsutveckling: utveckling och forskning under sex år i fyra städer. / [ed] Eriksson, Charli, Örebro: Örebro universitet , 2010Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 40.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Eriksson, Charli
    Sandberg, Andreas
    Välfärdsutveckling på stadsdelsnivå: Baronbackarna i Örebro, Dalhem i Helsingborg, Hageby i Norrköping och Pettersberg i Västerås2007Report (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Linde, Jonas
    Universitetet i Bergen.
    Unpacking Semi-Presidentialism: Government performance and democracy in four different regime types2016In: Swepsa 2016, 2016Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Semi-presidentialism has become a widespread choice among constitution makers around the world. Elgie (1999) defines semi-presidentialism as a system where the constitution includes both a popularly elected president and a prime minister and cabinet accountable to the parliament. With his inclusive definition there are 53 countries with a semi-presidential constitution. The aim of this paper is two-folded. First, we want to demonstrate the empirically value of using the distinction between the two sub-types of semi-presidentialism, i.e. between premier-presidential and president-parliamentary regimes. Second, by using indicators on regime performance and democracy from the QoG dataset on 173 countries, we examine the performance records of premier-presidential and president-parliamentary regimes. This is done in relation to parliamentarism and presidentialism. We find a manifest difference between the two sub-types of semi-presidentialism. While premier-presidential regimes have performance records close to parliamentary regimes, president-parliamentary regimes display performance records more similar to pure presidentialism, and it performs even worse on most indicators.

  • 42.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Linde, Jonas
    Universitetet i Bergen.
    Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types2018In: Democratization, ISSN 1351-0347, E-ISSN 1743-890X, Vol. 25, no 1, p. 136-157Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Do semi-presidential regimes perform worse than other regime types? Semi-presidentialism has become a preferred choice among constitution makers worldwide. The semi-presidential category contains anything but a coherent set of regimes. We need to separate between its two subtypes, premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism. Following Linz’s argument that presidentialism and semi-presidentialism are less conducive to democracy than parliamentarism a number of studies have empirically analyzed the functioning and performance of semi-presidentialism. However, these studies have investigated the performance of semi-presidential sub-types in isolation from other constitutional regimes. By using indicators on regime performance and democracy, the aim of this study is to examine the performance of premier-presidential and president-parliamentary regimes in relation to parliamentarism and presidentialism. Premier-presidential regimes show performance records on par with parliamentarism and on some measures even better. President-parliamentary regimes, on the contrary, perform worse than all other regime types on most of our included measures. The results of this novel study provide a strong call to constitution makers to stay away from president-parliamentarism as well as against the idea of thinking about semi-presidentialism as a single and coherent type of regime.

  • 43.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Mashtaler, Olga
    A Troubled Tandem?: Character and Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict under Semi-Presidentialism2012Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 44.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Mashtaler, Olga
    Twenty Years of Semi-Presidentialism: Intra-Executive Conflict in Eastern Europe 1991-20102011In: CBEES: Political Leadership and Changes of Power in the Baltic Sea Region, Södertörns högskola, 2011Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Mashtaler, Olga
    National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kiev.
    Two Decades of Semi-Presidentialism: Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991-20112013In: East European Politics, ISSN 2159-9165, E-ISSN 2159-9173, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 109-134Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Semi-presidentialism has become an increasingly popular form of government worldwide and has emerged as the most common regime type in Central and Eastern Europe and among the post-Soviet states. An often identified - although rarely empirically addressed - peril of semi-presidentialism is the risk of intra-executive struggles between the president and prime minister. This study analysis the trend and issues of intra-executive conflicts in eight semi-presidential (premier-presidential and president-parliamentary) countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, Croatia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine. By utilising expert survey data as well as indicators derived from documentary and literature analysis, 76 instances of intra-executive (president–cabinet) coexistences between 1991 and 2011 are examined. The results show that intra-executive conflict has been a frequently occurring phenomenon under both types of semi-presidentialism, and one that has persisted on similar levels throughout the post-communist era. In addition, and quite unexpectedly, we find that the character of conflicts have only slightly changed from being predominantly power struggles over formal rules and competences to being more issue specific and policy oriented.

  • 46.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Sandberg, Andreas
    Eriksson, Charli
    Indikatorer för hållbar välfärdsutveckling på stadsdelsnivå2010In: Partnerskap för hållbar välfärdsutveckling: utveckling och forskning under sex år i fyra städer / [ed] Eriksson, Charli, Örebro: Örebro universitet , 2010Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Åberg, Jenny
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Eastern Europe’s semi-presidential regimes2018In: The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics / [ed] Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecky, London: Routledge, 2018, p. 67-81Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 48.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Åberg, Jenny
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Semi-Presidential Systems2019In: Oxford Bibliographies: Political ScienceArticle, review/survey (Refereed)
  • 49.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Åström, Joachim
    E-deltagande som medborgerligt och politiskt projekt2011In: Perspektiv på offentlig verksamhet i utveckling: tolv kapitel om demokrati, styrning och effektivitet / [ed] Hellberg, Ann-Sofie m.fl, Örebro universitet , 2011Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Åberg, Jenny
    et al.
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    Sedelius, Thomas
    Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Political Science.
    A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results, and Missing Pieces2018In: British Journal of Political Science, ISSN 0007-1234, E-ISSN 1469-2112Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This study maps the general lines of semi-presidential research with regard to theory, topics and methods. It identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for future studies. The review includes a general screening of 327 publications covering the period 1970–2015, and a close reading of sixty-five selected publications. The findings suggest that the inconsistent use of regime type definitions has limited the possibilities for generalizations. The study tracks the influence of some seminal articles, as well as the recent trend of focusing on the role and powers of the president. The article calls for more studies beyond Europe, and suggests that the field would benefit from including Historical and Normative Institutionalism. Finally, it suggests the need for studies on public administration that are relevant to the functioning of semi-presidential government.

12 1 - 50 of 53
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf