Episiotomy and the medicalization make childbirth worse for women Our journal, Sexual and Reproductive Health Care (SRHC) received a letter to the editor from a group of healthcare professionals in Pakistan expressing concerns over the routine use of episiotomy during childbirth in their country. This issue is not isolated to Pakistan: many less industrialized countries in East Asia also report high rates of episiotomy. A 2018 systematic review highlighted the decline in the use of episiotomy in Europe and North America since the late 1980s, showing a decreasing trend in 26 countries. Notably, Sweden Iceland and Denmark reported episiotomy rates between 4–9 %, the lowest countries overall. Conversely, Asian countries in the same study data showed significantly higher rates with the following countries at the top of that list: India (68 % estimated in 2007/2008) China (85.50 % in 2003), Thailand (91.00 % in 2005), Vietnam (86.10 % in 1999) and notably Taiwan with an estimated rate of 100 % in 2002. Rates in other parts of the world generally range from 30 % to 50 % [1]. The routine performance of episiotomy is just one example among many of the trend towards medicalization of birth globally, in high and low-income countries around the world. a positive childbirth experience mentions 56 routines for intrapartum care, of which 21 are not recommended based on existing studies, including the routine or liberal use of episiotomy for women undergoing spontaneous vaginal birth. A positive postnatal experience should ensure that women, newborns, partners, parents, caregivers, and families receive consistent information, reassurance and support from motivated health workers withing a flexible, adequately resourced health system that recognizes their needs and respects their cultural contexts, and employs the best available evidence. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The transformation of normal birth through socio-cultural and ideological influences has led childbirths dominated by medicalization. Examples include the routine use of episiotomy, continuous fetal monitoring with CTG, liberal use of amniotomy, early cord clamping and cesarean section. Some studies indicate that women are simply placed in a passive, submissive or victimized position by the medical authority [2] without positively impacting mortality rates [5]. Furthermore, medicalization of birth could be correlated with obstetric violence, first recognized at state level in Venezuela in 2007 [3,4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that the concept of “normality” in childbirth is neither universal nor standardized. Over the last two decades, there has been a substantial increase in the application of a range of labour practices with the intention to initiate, accelerate, terminate, regulate, or monitor the physiological process of labour, with the aim of improving outcomes for women and babies. However, “this increasing medicalization of childbirth processes trends to undermine the woman’s own capability to give birth and negatively impacts her childbirth experience” [6]. The WHO guidelines for intrapartum care for