Now the trains are rolling again’, this was the title of an article in Falu Kurirer journal in August 2019 announcing the re-opening for freight transport of the abandoned railway up to Malung. A few months earlier, in April 2019, another article was titled ‘The vision: Passenger railway to Sälen’ signposted the beginning of a public discourse for the re-opening and eventually the expansion of the railway in north Dalarna and possibly to Norway for passengers.
In December 2019 a brand-new airport was inaugurated in the mountains of Dalarna, the first after 20 years in Sweden, which was debated as a better alternative over a railway. Pro-growth discourses were found in support of it for the generation of jobs, internationalisation of tourism, growth, and regional development and was delivered as a public-private partnership (Elbe & Farsari, 2023). At the same time, the vision to rebuild and expand the old railway was communicated from the same actors who were involved in the construction of the airport. In 2024 a company was launched with partners from local municipalities, DMOs, and private business, to examine and decide on the feasibility of the project in the forthcoming 18 months.
We perform a critical discourse analysis in local and national newspapers concerning the Scandinavian Mountains Railway project. Our aim is to better understand the actors represented (and those excluded) from the governance process, the role of private actors and public institutions at different levels, and to unveil agendas and power structures.
We employ a (meta)governance lens to understand power discourses in the development of the plan and understand tourism’s role in it and the prevalence of certain discourses and certain interests over others (Jessop 2011). Governance highlights representativeness, plurality of goals and flexible networks (also in the form of public-private partnerships) with an emphasis on efficiency. Metagovernance takes this further to add a critical understanding on the self-organisation of those flexible structures, of power negotiations, and the role of the state (Amore & Hall, 2016; Sørensen, 2006).
This is a work in progress and preliminary analysis has shown the entanglement of local authorities with the local DMO and the tourism industry who together are driving the developments while the state traffic/infrastructure agencies are not part of the same discourses and develop their own. Discourses also change in the course of time with the war in Ukraine and Sweden entering NATO and build on a ‘dual use’ of the railway for defense as well as for public/goods transport. Climate concerns, tourists’ mobility as well as goods transfer are also becoming part of it as well as funding, public-private partnerships and cross-border collaboration. Power struggles to take ownership of the project and define the routes are also part of the discourses.
References
Amore, A., & Hall, C. M. (2016). From governance to meta-governance in tourism? Re-incorporating politics, interests and values in the analysis of tourism governance. Tourism Recreation Research, 41(2), 109-122. doi:10.1080/02508281.2016.1151162
Elbe, J., & Farsari, I. (2023). Do we need a new airport in the Mountains? An analysis of soft and strong sustainability arguments. In Enabling Sustainable Visits (pp. 53-78). Retrieved from FULLTEXT01.pdf
Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance. The SAGE Handbook of Governance, 106-123. doi:10.4135/9781446200964.n8
Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance:The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114. doi:10.1177/0275074005282584