Extended Summary
An engaging and enriching Vinnova-funded project involving thirteen actors has now been completed. All of us in the research team the research team will miss the collaboration with Borlänge, Älvsbyn and Kiruna — the three communities involved in the project as learning cases and empirical foci. These three locations are all currently affected by large-scale industrial initiatives, planned or implemented as part of the green transition. We have explored the learning cases together with representatives from the municipalities, civil society, industry and various consultants through a co-creative process and meeting format that we call the Actors’ Forum.
We will also miss our research team’s own dynamic discussions, in comparing the learning cases from the three complementary knowledge perspectives that we represent: architecture and planning, history, and cultural heritage research. Our methods, concepts and practical experience differ, but over time we have identified several points of intersection between our disciplines and discourses. Further, we have come to recognize the necessity of working across disciplinary boundaries in order to clarify and understand both the complex contexts associated with developments in northern Sweden, and the local socio-cultural and historical frameworks.
These industrial enterprises that we analyze occur in response to European demands for critical metals, minerals and fossil-free technologies relating to the green transition. The challenges are manifold, not least because such developments often occur in municipalities that have already initiated ambitious and goal-driven efforts towards climate-neutral cities and a circular economy. More recently, the need for capacity-building and preparedness for civil defense has further highlighted the need for self-sufficiency in critical raw materials. The selected learning cases host not only valuable minerals and metals, but also socio-cultural, industrial-historical, architectural and other values that must be considered and addressed from a cultural heritage and sustainability perspective. Our research shows that that the existing planning process and its legal frameworks were not designed to manage this level of complexity.
It has been important to interpret the learning cases against the backdrop of the layered development trajectories that have shaped these places over long periods — sometimes centuries — through decisions, pathways and interactions. One fruitful tool we have explored is to create historic timelines for the learning cases, indicating when key events occurred and when decisions were taken which proved decisive for future development. These timelines have also informed our work to characterize and problematize the goal conflicts which were raised by the actors who participated in the Actors’ Forum and workshops. We have used the timelines to identify what we term windows of opportunity — moments in history when alternative choices were possible and could have led to different outcomes.
At an early stage, we recognized that the project’s task was not to resolve conflicts; rather, it has aimed to support actors in identifying windows of opportunity that can be used to redefine goal conflicts. This can also be described as strengthening local capacity and preparedness among all those who, in various ways, are engaged in industrial developments in the north.
During the course of the project, we have observed that windows of opportunity can arise in many different contexts, and that situations initially perceived as intractable conflicts can, in some cases, develop into scenarios characterized by synergies — for example, when additional actors contribute new perspectives. By strengthening actors’ capacity to redefine goal conflicts within a co-creative process, we have seen how synergies can emerge, and how conflicts can be reframed and, in some cases, prevented.
The project’s objectives have been to:
- Integrate cultural and value-creation perspectives, as well as cultural values, into the planning process for attractive living environments in the north, and provide a multidimensional methodological toolbox to support actors and collaboration in the green transition; and to
- Prevent goal conflicts related to the green transition in the north by making better use of windows of opportunity within the spatial planning process, its policy and practice.
Regarding the latter, we have actively worked with the concept of prevention in order to achieve a more nuanced understanding of the transformation processes in which goal conflicts are always embedded. One of the project’s key strategic outcomes is therefore the clarification achieved through the value-based conceptual framework developed to support actors in collectively transforming conflicts into synergies. In summary, this outcome comprises three knowledge perspectives, five principles, and twenty operational tools.
The overall result is a multidimensional methodological toolbox and an associated value-creation conceptual framework to support all those involved in establishment processes. The toolbox contains tools to support the transformation of conflicts into synergies. A co-creative process helps to balance and, where possible, integrate actors’ differing starting points and approaches to value creation in society, whether they represent industry, municipalities, civil society or consultancy practice. This applies both to existing values (cultural heritage, architecture, history) and to anticipated societal impacts linked to the transition.
We note that actors’ different ways of valuing can be related to their differing drivers, tempos and expectations regarding the transition process itself. In addition, organizational challenges and hierarchies hinder shared understanding and collaboration. Furthermore, actors as individuals are grounded in different educational cultures and professional discourses, which means that concepts and practices necessarily vary. In consequence, we see the need for a shared vocabulary and conceptual calibration between actors from industry and others representing various practices and expertise in conservation and value creation within the built environment. This includes architects and planners, historians and building conservation specialists working within municipalities, in consultancy practice or civil society. At the same time, the professional practices and educational structures within the built environment sector also differ: they serve different purposes and reflect the increased fragmentation of planning and development processes. This runs counter to the present and future need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the complex challenges posed by climate change and resource-efficient planning models such as the circular economy. One of the project’s conclusions is therefore the need for continued methodological and conceptual development to bring together built environment professions within a shared, expanded discourse that better harnesses existing societal values. This is particularly timely as several educational programmes are currently undergoing renewal to meet the challenges of climate transition and circular economy.
The methodological toolbox and value-based conceptual framework constitute a result at both a long-term strategic level and a short-term tactical, operational level, complementing the formal spatial planning process, its policy and practice. The broader question of how informal and formal processes interact and could be better integrated has not been the focus of this project but is proposed as an area for further research. The framework presented here has strong potential for application within planning processes, for example by strengthening early consultation and permitting stages through multidisciplinary Actors’ Forums.
Over the course of the project, the team has gradually refined and broadened its understanding of the issues encompassed by the concept of the green transition. During the three-year period under review, the public debate has shifted, not least due to simplified media representations of the extensive development processes in northern Sweden. The transition undoubtedly constitutes a complex web of initiatives that generate goal conflicts. Not all are green. In recent months, Sweden has increased the pace of preparedness measures, which may contribute to further conflicts and challenges for municipalities. At the same time, the EU has adopted the Critical Raw Materials Act, highlighting the importance of Sweden’s mineral resources. Meanwhile, Swedish planning policy has shifted from a focus on sustainable and attractive living environments to a strategy centred on liveable and safe cities.
During the project period, the high-profile battery producer Northvolt both established and dismantled its operations in Borlänge — and demolished a unique industrial building of significant architectural value in the process, which the project nevertheless attempted to preserve by utilising a window of opportunity. This loss of Swedish cultural heritage from 1897 could likely have been avoided through better foresight and coordination. A more fruitful outcome is the close collaboration that the municipality has achieved with other industrial actors, such as SSAB, with strong potential to achieve the goal of a climate-neutral city by 2030.
In Älvsbyn, the company Boliden has been granted a concession for extracting a major copper deposit in Laver, near a former mine (1938–1946) where a model community was once built for employees and their families. Today, traces of this cultural environment remain, with potential for development as a visitor destination. Through the project, a fruitful dialogue was established between the municipality and industry, with expectations towards a constructive collaboration process in the complex setting where reindeer husbandry, environmental and cultural values intersect with industrial interests.
In Kiruna, mining activities continue to drive large parts of urban development. Land-use and ownership issues dominate ongoing debates, reflecting complex relations between the state and municipality. In August 2025, Kiruna’s famous landmark church was relocated as part of the ongoing transformation, while an important part of the remaining built environment continues to be demolished. The project’s learning case has focused on a limited cultural environment with remaining artefacts from the very first mining activity at the beginning of the 20th century, where substantial tensions however remain between industrial and heritage interests. At the close of the project in December 2025, a court ruling prevented the demolition of a culturally significant structure — an encouraging outcome, although the process continues.
We have had the privilege of working in Borlänge, Kiruna and Älvsbyn during the relatively short period of three years (2023–2025). Thanks to the strong engagement of our project partners, we have been able to take part in numerous meaningful and value-creating situations that form the basis of this report. We extend our sincere thanks to all who have contributed to the project.
Stockholm, Göteborg, Falun and Luleå, december 2025
The research team:
Charlie Gullström (Project Leader), charlie.gullstrom@sweco.se
Tony Svensson, tsn@du.se
Ulf Ranhagen, urn@du.se
Jennie Sjöholm, jennie.sjoholm@gu.se
Elin Bäckersten, elin.backersten@sweco.se
Anders Houltz, anders.houltz@naringslivshistoria.se
Benito Peix Geldart, benito.peixgeldart@naringslivshistoria.se
Dag Avango, dag.avango@ltu.se
Slutrapport från projektet Målkonflikter i den gröna omställningen: Metodverktygslåda för kultur- och värdeskapande i planering 2023–2025