Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Har lågpresterande elever svårare att självbedöma?: Självbedömningens validitet i relation till prestationsnivå inom samhällskunskap
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Educational Work.
2020 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Self-assessments validity in relation to achievement level in social studies (English)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between students' achievement level and the validity of students' self-assessments in the course social studies. The students were divided into two achievement groups, low-achiever and high-achiever. Low achievers were students with the grade F-D in the subject of social science and high achievers were students with the grade C-A in the subject of social science. The students had to do a test which they then had to self-assess. The questions on the test were divided into three abilities; factual knowledge, understanding and skill. The students did three self-assessments, one for each ability. The study found that there is a positive correlation between the students' level of achievement and the validity of the self-assessments. This was in line with previous research (Yao-Ting, 2010). The low achieving students overestimated an average of 0.7 grade points compared to the high achievers who overestimated an average of 0.3. The study saw a certain difference in the validity of self-assessments depending on ability, factual knowledge was the ability that the students overestimated themselves most.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020.
Keywords [en]
self-assessment, level of achievement, ability, factual knowledge, understanding, skill, social science
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-34494OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-34494DiVA, id: diva2:1451668
Available from: 2020-07-03 Created: 2020-07-03 Last updated: 2025-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(459 kB)182 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 459 kBChecksum SHA-512
5a3831c41dffe8aace7958a5403de197c6a56e211c4279abbad92901848a8537b054dfbefd815c4f8015dd89e937ae01db1fbffca66dbee2229142e5a839de77
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Educational Work
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 183 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 163 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf