Dalarna University's logo and link to the university's website

du.sePublications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Friedman doctrine prevails! Or does it?: Evidence from the views of practitioners on corporate sustainability in their firms
Dalarna University, School of Information and Engineering, Microdata Analysis.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2952-7327
Dalarna University, School of Culture and Society, Business Administration and Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4333-0259
2021 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to provide insights on the views of firms regarding corporate sustainability (CS) and how the structure of the board affects this. We surveyed the CEOs, CFOs, and Environment Officers of about 850 Swedish firms (response rate 21%) affected by mandatory sustainability reporting after the implementation of the EU Directive 2014/95/EU. The six-transcending ambition levels (namely: pre-CS, compliance-driven, profit-driven, caring, synergistic, and holistic) of corporate sustainability proposed by van Marrewijk & Werre (2003) were used to classify the views of key officers on the sustainability agenda of their respective firms. We find that the drive by firms for higher CS ambition levels is positively influenced by a diverse board (i.e., representation of female board members), and the effect is more pronounced if the board is constituted with a female top executive. Moreover, younger top executives are more likely to have a higher CS ambition level. On the other hand, external CEOs, external board members, and forceful disclosure of sustainability activity (e.g., EU Directive 2014/95/EU) do not significantly influence CS ambition levels, whereas firm size and industry affiliation do. Our findings are useful for top managers and regulators interested in corporate governance issues and influencing the sustainability efforts of their firms. Methodologically, the use of a survey method is an extension to an otherwise high reliance on archival research in the field of CS. Furthermore, the dataset is unique, and the results are robust to various sensitivity analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borlänge: Dalarna University, 2021.
Series
Working papers in transport, tourism, information technology and microdata analysis, ISSN 1650-5581 ; 2021:04
Keywords [en]
corporate sustainability; board diversity; sustainability regulations; gender; survey
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-38117OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-38117DiVA, id: diva2:1594588
Available from: 2021-09-15 Created: 2021-09-15 Last updated: 2025-11-14
In thesis
1. Corporate Disclosures Regulations: Social Solution or a Problem?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Corporate Disclosures Regulations: Social Solution or a Problem?
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Regulations are argued to have the answer to solving various social and economic problems that society faces today (e.g., climate change, tax evasion, etc.). However, regulations may instead become the problem (e.g., overregulation). The central research question of this doctoral thesis is “are corporate disclosures regulations a social solution or a problem?” 

To answer the central research question, Papers I and II examine the economic effects of an EU-wide audit reform, the Annual Accounts Directive: 2013/34/EU, on firms and the society. Papers III, IV, and V examine firm behavior to assess the need for public regulation of nonfinancial reporting in the light of an EU-wide reform, the Nonfinancial Reporting Directive: 2014/95/EU, commonly known as the NFRD.

The thesis posits that the current implementations of these reforms in some settings are imperfect and thus costly for the firms and society. It recommends deregulation of the monitoring of financial disclosure, i.e., to allow more small firms the option of deciding if an audit is beneficial for them or not. On the other hand, recommends a different approach for regulating nonfinancial reporting, e.g., sustainability reporting. For instance, regulations that can influence firms’ governance structure, e.g., board diversity. A firm with a diverse board is more likely to adopt a sustainability agenda which is better aligned with the expectations of the EU regulators. 

Stakeholders use firms’ disclosures to evaluate its performance and behavior for various decision making. For example, shareholders, in their investing or divesting decisions; analysts, in making various forecasts and recommendations; or governments, in assessing the need for reforms. Historically, stakeholders commonly used financial information for these types of decision making. Hence, there are well established generic measures to evaluate firms’ financial information (e.g., earnings quality measures and financial-statement ratios). Nowadays, stakeholders are increasingly using firms’ sustainability related information in their decision-making process as well. However, replicable and scalable generic measures to evaluate such information are missing. This thesis develops objective approaches and a generic measure, to evaluate firms’ sustainability related disclosures. The developed approaches for analyzing unstructured text data may be applied to other fields that can benefit from the use of natural language processing tools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borlänge: Dalarna University, 2021
Series
Dalarna Doctoral Dissertations ; 17
Keywords
audit choice, audit regulations, corporate governance, corporate sustainability, EU-wide accounting reforms, firm growth, greenhouse gas emissions, machine learning, microdata analysis, natural learning processing, new institutional economics, nonfinancial reporting, survey
National Category
Business Administration Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:du-38100 (URN)978-91-88679-16-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-11-12, Room 311, Borlänge, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-10-18 Created: 2021-09-14 Last updated: 2025-10-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(678 kB)651 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 678 kBChecksum SHA-512
3a1354fc0930ac54a127e52e2b2f503cc8a305d092ffbefec8f02024690ec5431edd86b92b70677b3d327ca311667974f326de46824e34bc7e8f710810603912
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Huq, Asif MSundberg, Klas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Huq, Asif MSundberg, Klas
By organisation
Microdata AnalysisBusiness Administration and Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 651 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1456 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • chicago-author-date
  • chicago-note-bibliography
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf