This study investigates relationships between Sweden's integration policies and the predominant issues of crime and violence, specifically among Muslim immigrant communities. As Western countries experience demographic shifts due to immigration, debates concerning the integration and treatment of migrants have intensified. Sweden, known for its historically progressive policies, has witnessed a shift towards more restrictive integration strategies, influenced heavily by the rise of radical right-wing political narratives throughout Europe. This research uses qualitative discourse analysis and WPR method to explore ethnonationalism and especially discursive discrimination in form of negative other presentation and proposals of unfavorable treatment, and how this affects immigrants in Swedish policy discourse. The study goes deeper into the Swedish authorities' portrayal of migration, integration, and crime as principal causes of current societal challenges, offering a comprehensive analysis of these complicated interrelations. The findings aim to a better understanding of the broader impacts of Sweden's integration policies on societal unity and public safety, and show the important role of political discourse and its profound impact on public perception and democratic processes. There are cases of discursive discrimination and the study critiques the Swedish government's assumptions regarding segregation and crime prevention, highlighting the tendency to label certain groups as potential criminals based on their ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status and residential areas. It calls for a more holistic approach to integration, acknowledges the role of structural inequality and advocates for a shift towards addressing power dynamics rather than focusing solely on individuals or neighborhoods.