The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology raise questions about whether expertise in music or video production will soon be unnecessary to create compelling audiovisual experiences. AI has significantly influenced both the music industry and the audiovisual field, with an increasing number of works being partially or entirely AI-generated. As an audiovisual creator, I approach this development with a mix of curiosity and concern, with questions about whether AI can replicate the depth and intentionality of human creativity. This essay explores the differences between AI-generated and human-created audiovisual works and examines how individuals perceive and emotionally respond to AI-generated works themselves. The findings reveal that biases against AI-generated works play a significant role in participants' reactions. Even when unaware of a video's origins, participants often described the AI-generated video as strange or "off" in some way. Even without explicit knowledge, most could correctly identify which video was AI-generated and generally favored human-created works, giving credit to their great eremotional depth and expressiveness. This suggests that despite AI's advancements, it has not yet reached a point where it can replace human creators in the artistic realm.